mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Leveraging Semantic Triples for Private Document Generation with Local Differential Privacy Guarantees

arXiv 2508.20736 ↗First posted 28 Aug 2025cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many works at the intersection of Differential Privacy (DP) in Natural Language Processing aim to protect privacy by transforming texts under DP guarantees. This can be performed in a variety of ways, from word perturbations to full document rewriting, and most often under local DP. Here, an input text must be made indistinguishable from any other potential text, within some bound governed by the privacy parameter varepsilon. Such a guarantee is quite demanding, and recent works show that privatizing texts under local DP can only be done reasonably under very high varepsilon values. Addressing this challenge, we introduce DP-ST, which leverages semantic triples for neighborhood-aware private document generation under local DP guarantees. Through the evaluation of our method, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the divide-and-conquer paradigm, particularly when limiting the DP notion (and privacy guarantees) to that of a privatization neighborhood. When combined with LLM post-processing, our method allows for coherent text generation even at lower varepsilon values, while still balancing privacy and utility. These findings highlight the importance of coherence in achieving balanced privatization outputs at reasonable varepsilon levels.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2025.

Builds on

25 of 40 references.

References · 25

  1. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  2. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  3. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  4. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
  5. 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,181
  6. 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,160
  7. 2023Towards General Text Embeddings with Multi-stage Contrastive Learningcited by 723
  8. 2018Improving the Gaussian Mechanism for Differential Privacy: Analytical Calibration and Optimal Denoisingcited by 218
  9. 2024jina-embeddings-v3: Multilingual Embeddings With Task LoRAcited by 141
  10. 2019Privacy- and Utility-Preserving Textual Analysis via Calibrated Multivariate Perturbationscited by 119
  11. 2024FineSurE: Fine-grained Summarization Evaluation using LLMscited by 83
  12. 2022The Limits of Word Level Differential Privacycited by 63
13 more
  1. 2023Locally Differentially Private Document Generation Using Zero Shot Promptingcited by 63
  2. 2018Generalised Differential Privacy for Text Document Processingcited by 52
  3. 2021TEM: High Utility Metric Differential Privacy on Textcited by 43
  4. 2019ER-AE: Differentially Private Text Generation for Authorship Anonymizationcited by 35
  5. 2022DP-Rewrite: Towards Reproducibility and Transparency in Differentially Private Text Rewritingcited by 28
  6. 2021When differential privacy meets NLP: The devil is in the detailcited by 25
  7. 2024DP-MLM: Differentially Private Text Rewriting Using Masked Language Modelscited by 24
  8. 2021The Impact of the U.S. Census Disclosure Avoidance System on Redistricting and Voting Rights Analysiscited by 19
  9. 2023Guiding Text-to-Text Privatization by Syntaxcited by 14
  10. 2024Thinking Outside of the Differential Privacy Box: A Case Study in Text Privatization with Language Model Promptingcited by 11
  11. 2024Just Rewrite It Again: A Post-Processing Method for Enhanced Semantic Similarity and Privacy Preservation of Differentially Private Rewritten Textcited by 9
  12. 2024AdaptEval: Evaluating Large Language Models on Domain Adaptation for Text Summarizationcited by 9
  13. 2024A Comparative Analysis of Conversational Large Language Models in Knowledge-Based Text Generationcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.