mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Evaluating Differentially Private Generation of Domain-Specific Text

arXiv 2508.20452 ↗First posted 28 Aug 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CRcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative AI offers transformative potential for high-stakes domains such as healthcare and finance, yet privacy and regulatory barriers hinder the use of real-world data. To address this, differentially private synthetic data generation has emerged as a promising alternative. In this work, we introduce a unified benchmark to systematically evaluate the utility and fidelity of text datasets generated under formal Differential Privacy (DP) guarantees. Our benchmark addresses key challenges in domain-specific benchmarking, including choice of representative data and realistic privacy budgets, accounting for pre-training and a variety of evaluation metrics. We assess state-of-the-art privacy-preserving generation methods across five domain-specific datasets, revealing significant utility and fidelity degradation compared to real data, especially under strict privacy constraints. These findings underscore the limitations of current approaches, outline the need for advanced privacy-preserving data sharing methods and set a precedent regarding their evaluation in realistic scenarios.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2025.

Builds on

22 of 45 references.

References · 22

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  2. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  3. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  4. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
  5. 2021MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence Frontierscited by 470
  6. 2018Scalable Private Learning with PATEcited by 269
  7. 2022Synthetic Text Generation with Differential Privacy: A Simple and Practical Recipecited by 108
  8. 2024Differentially Private Synthetic Data via Foundation Model APIs 2: Textcited by 76
  9. 2022Differentially Private Language Models for Secure Data Sharingcited by 68
  10. 2022The Limits of Word Level Differential Privacycited by 63
  11. 2024Privacy-Preserving Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Differential Privacycited by 39
  12. 2022TabSynDex: A Universal Metric for Robust Evaluation of Synthetic Tabular Datacited by 27
10 more
  1. 2024Training on the Benchmark Is Not All You Needcited by 25
  2. 2024Private prediction for large-scale synthetic text generationcited by 24
  3. 2024Differentially Private Next-Token Prediction of Large Language Modelscited by 22
  4. 2023Synthetic is all you need: removing the auxiliary data assumption for membership inference attacks against synthetic datacited by 18
  5. 2025The Canary's Echo: Auditing Privacy Risks of LLM-Generated Synthetic Textcited by 18
  6. 2024Private Synthetic Text Generation with Diffusion Modelscited by 10
  7. 2023A Two-Stage Decoder for Efficient ICD Codingcited by 9
  8. 2024LLMs are not Zero-Shot Reasoners for Biomedical Information Extractioncited by 9
  9. 2024MEDSAGE: Enhancing Robustness of Medical Dialogue Summarization to ASR Errors with LLM-generated Synthetic Dialoguescited by 8
  10. 2023Automated Refugee Case Analysis: An NLP Pipeline for Supporting Legal Practitionerscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.