mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Socially Interactive Agents for Preserving and Transferring Tacit Knowledge in Organizations

arXiv 2508.19942 ↗First posted 27 Aug 2025cs.HCcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Social simulation and multi-agent debate

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper introduces a novel approach to tackle the challenges of preserving and transferring tacit knowledge--deep, experience-based insights that are hard to articulate but vital for decision-making, innovation, and problem-solving. Traditional methods rely heavily on human facilitators, which, while effective, are resource-intensive and lack scalability. A promising alternative is the use of Socially Interactive Agents (SIAs) as AI-driven knowledge transfer facilitators. These agents interact autonomously and socially intelligently with users through multimodal behaviors (verbal, paraverbal, nonverbal), simulating expert roles in various organizational contexts. SIAs engage employees in empathic, natural-language dialogues, helping them externalize insights that might otherwise remain unspoken. Their success hinges on building trust, as employees are often hesitant to share tacit knowledge without assurance of confidentiality and appreciation. Key technologies include Large Language Models (LLMs) for generating context-relevant dialogue, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to integrate organizational knowledge, and Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting to guide structured reflection. These enable SIAs to actively elicit knowledge, uncover implicit assumptions, and connect insights to broader organizational contexts. Potential applications span onboarding, where SIAs support personalized guidance and introductions, and knowledge retention, where they conduct structured interviews with retiring experts to capture heuristics behind decisions. Success depends on addressing ethical and operational challenges such as data privacy, algorithmic bias, and resistance to AI. Transparency, robust validation, and a culture of trust are essential to mitigate these risks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 3 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2025.

Builds on

3 of 13 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024LLM-Augmented Agent-Based Modelling for Social Simulations: Challenges and Opportunities8 May

Other references · 2

  1. 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,212
  2. 2020Designing a Mobile Social and Vocational Reintegration Assistant for Burn-out Outpatient Treatmentcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Transforming Competition into Collaboration: The Revolutionary Role of Multi-Agent Systems and Language Models in Modern Organizations
  2. 2025On the Role of Contextual Information and Ego States in LLM Agent Behavior for Transactional Analysis Dialogues
  3. 2025SI-Bench: Benchmarking Social Intelligence of Large Language Models in Human-to-Human Conversations
  4. 2024Embodied LLM Agents Learn to Cooperate in Organized Teams
  5. 2025Toward Generalized Autonomous Agents: A Neuro-Symbolic AI Framework for Integrating Social and Technical Support in Education
  6. 2026Towards Trust Calibration in Socially Interactive Agents: Investigating Gendered Multimodal Behaviors Generation with LLMs
  7. 2023Thinking Assistants: LLM-Based Conversational Assistants that Help Users Think By Asking rather than Answering
  8. 2025Supporting Construction Worker Well-Being with a Multi-Agent Conversational AI System