The Art of Hide and Seek: Making Pickle-Based Model Supply Chain Poisoning Stealthy Again
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Pickle deserialization vulnerabilities have persisted throughout Python's history, remaining widely recognized yet unresolved. Due to its ability to transparently save and restore complex objects into byte streams, many AI/ML frameworks continue to adopt pickle as the model serialization protocol despite its inherent risks. As the open-source model ecosystem grows, model-sharing platforms such as Hugging Face have attracted massive participation, significantly amplifying the real-world risks of pickle exploitation and opening new avenues for model supply chain poisoning. Although several state-of-the-art scanners have been developed to detect poisoned models, their incomplete understanding of the poisoning surface leaves the detection logic fragile and allows attackers to bypass them. In this work, we present the first systematic disclosure of the pickle-based model poisoning surface from both model loading and risky function perspectives. Our research demonstrates how pickle-based model poisoning can remain stealthy and highlights critical gaps in current scanning solutions. On the model loading surface, we identify 22 distinct pickle-based model loading paths across five foundational AI/ML frameworks, 19 of which are entirely missed by existing scanners. We further develop a bypass technique named Exception-Oriented Programming (EOP) and discover 9 EOP instances, 7 of which can bypass all scanners. On the risky function surface, we discover 133 exploitable gadgets, achieving almost a 100% bypass rate. Even against the best-performing scanner, these gadgets maintain an 89% bypass rate. By systematically revealing the pickle-based model poisoning surface, we achieve practical and robust bypasses against real-world scanners. We responsibly disclose our findings to corresponding vendors, receiving acknowledgments and a 6000 bug bounty.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2025.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025Living Off the LLM: How LLMs Will Change Adversary Tacticscited by 1
- 2026SafePickle: Robust and Generic ML Detection of Malicious Pickle-based ML Modelscited by 1
- 2025MEASER: Malware embedding attacks on open-source LLMscited by 0
- 2026Lifecycle-Aware Dynamic Analysis for Secure ML Model Executioncited by 0
- 2026Lifecycle-Aware Dynamic Analysis for Secure ML Model Execution17 Jun 2026
- 2026SafePickle: Robust and Generic ML Detection of Malicious Pickle-based ML Models23 Feb 2026
- 2025Living Off the LLM: How LLMs Will Change Adversary Tactics13 Oct 2025
- 2025MEASER: Malware embedding attacks on open-source LLMs12 Oct 2025