SCAR: A Characterization Scheme for Multi-Modal Dataset
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Foundation models exhibit remarkable generalization across diverse tasks, largely driven by the characteristics of their training data. Recent data-centric methods like pruning and compression aim to optimize training but offer limited theoretical insight into how data properties affect generalization, especially the data characteristics in sample scaling. Traditional perspectives further constrain progress by focusing predominantly on data quantity and training efficiency, often overlooking structural aspects of data quality. In this study, we introduce SCAR, a principled scheme for characterizing the intrinsic structural properties of datasets across four key measures: Scale, Coverage, Authenticity, and Richness. Unlike prior data-centric measures, SCAR captures stable characteristics that remain invariant under dataset scaling, providing a robust and general foundation for data understanding. Leveraging these structural properties, we introduce Foundation Data-a minimal subset that preserves the generalization behavior of the full dataset without requiring model-specific retraining. We model single-modality tasks as step functions and estimate the distribution of the foundation data size to capture step-wise generalization bias across modalities in the target multi-modal dataset. Finally, we develop a SCAR-guided data completion strategy based on this generalization bias, which enables efficient, modality-aware expansion of modality-specific characteristics in multimodal datasets. Experiments across diverse multi-modal datasets and model architectures validate the effectiveness of SCAR in predicting data utility and guiding data acquisition. Code is available at https://github.com/McAloma/SCAR.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2025.
Builds on
18 of 27 references.
References · 18
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
- 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,109
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
- 2022CoCa: Contrastive Captioners are Image-Text Foundation Modelscited by 1,274
- 2022Large-scale Contrastive Language-Audio Pretraining with Feature Fusion and Keyword-to-Caption Augmentationcited by 719
- 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 413
- 2022X-CLIP: End-to-End Multi-grained Contrastive Learning for Video-Text Retrievalcited by 280
6 more
- 2019Uniform convergence may be unable to explain generalization in deep learningcited by 224
- 2023Pengi: An Audio Language Model for Audio Taskscited by 220
- 2020Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approachcited by 158
- 2023Dataset Quantizationcited by 48
- 2024Dataset Quantization with Active Learning based Adaptive Samplingcited by 13
- 2025Does Data Scaling Lead to Visual Compositional Generalization?cited by 13
Built on by
Not cited yet.