Quantization Robustness to Input Degradations for Object Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Post-training quantization (PTQ) is crucial for deploying efficient object detection models, like YOLO, on resource-constrained devices. However, the impact of reduced precision on model robustness to real-world input degradations such as noise, blur, and compression artifacts is a significant concern. This paper presents a comprehensive empirical study evaluating the robustness of YOLO models (nano to extra-large scales) across multiple precision formats: FP32, FP16 (TensorRT), Dynamic UINT8 (ONNX), and Static INT8 (TensorRT). We introduce and evaluate a degradation-aware calibration strategy for Static INT8 PTQ, where the TensorRT calibration process is exposed to a mix of clean and synthetically degraded images. Models were benchmarked on the COCO dataset under seven distinct degradation conditions (including various types and levels of noise, blur, low contrast, and JPEG compression) and a mixed-degradation scenario. Results indicate that while Static INT8 TensorRT engines offer substantial speedups (~1.5-3.3x) with a moderate accuracy drop (~3-7% mAP50-95) on clean data, the proposed degradation-aware calibration did not yield consistent, broad improvements in robustness over standard clean-data calibration across most models and degradations. A notable exception was observed for larger model scales under specific noise conditions, suggesting model capacity may influence the efficacy of this calibration approach. These findings highlight the challenges in enhancing PTQ robustness and provide insights for deploying quantized detectors in uncontrolled environments. All code and evaluation tables are available at https://github.com/AllanK24/QRID.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2025.
Builds on
12 of 21 references.
References · 12
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,550
- 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,840
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,862
- 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,315
- 2020YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detectioncited by 1,628
- 2017Quantization and Training of Neural Networks for Efficient Integer-Arithmetic-Only Inferencecited by 1,585
- 2021A Survey of Quantization Methods for Efficient Neural Network Inferencecited by 814
- 2018Albumentations: fast and flexible image augmentationscited by 558
- 2018Quantizing deep convolutional networks for efficient inference: A whitepapercited by 518
- 2021A White Paper on Neural Network Quantizationcited by 467
- 2016Quantized Neural Networks: Training Neural Networks with Low Precision Weights and Activationscited by 422
- 2017A Study and Comparison of Human and Deep Learning Recognition Performance Under Visual Distortionscited by 107
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Q-YOLO: Efficient Inference for Real-time Object Detection
- 2024Quantizing YOLOv7: A Comprehensive Study
- 2026RAMP: Robust Adaptive Mixed-Precision Quantization for Edge CPU Vision Models
- 2025MCAQ-YOLO: Morphological Complexity-Aware Quantization for Efficient Object Detection with Curriculum Learning
- 2023Improving Post-Training Quantization on Object Detection with Task Loss-Guided Lp Metric
- 2025Outlier-Aware Post-Training Quantization for Image Super-Resolution
- 2022YOLOv6: A Single-Stage Object Detection Framework for Industrial Applications
- 2025AIQViT: Architecture-Informed Post-Training Quantization for Vision Transformers