mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ReST-RL: Reinforcing LLM Reasoning through Unified Self-Training and Value-Guided Search

arXiv 2508.19576 ↗First posted 27 Aug 2025cs.AI cs.LGcited by 9

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

With respect to improving the reasoning accuracy of LLMs, the representative reinforcement learning (RL) method - Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) - has achieved critical success, yet it still suffers from the issue of insignificant reward signals. This paper introduces ReST-RL, a unified Reinforced Self-Training (ReST) policy-value framework that reconnects policy optimization and value-guided search to improve LLM reasoning ability. Firstly, ReST-GRPO adopts an optimized ReST-style algorithm to reshape the policy-induced trajectory distribution by increasing the reward variance of GRPO sampling and exposing the policy to more informative partial states, thereby improving training efficiency and effectiveness. Then, we further introduce a decoding optimization method, VM-MCTS, which trains a Value Model (VM) from self-collected Monte-Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) targets and deploys it through an adapted MCTS algorithm to provide precise process signals and verification scores, further enhancing reasoning accuracy. These two stages are internally dependent - ReST-GRPO yields higher-quality trajectories for value learning with VM-MCTS, which in turn enables more effective inference-time search. We validate our framework on multiple coding benchmarks (e.g., APPS, BigCodeBench, and HumanEval), where it significantly outperforms other reinforcement training baselines (naive GRPO, DAPO, and ReST-DPO), as well as decoding and verification baselines (e.g., PRM-BoN and ORM-MCTS), indicating its power to strengthen LLM reasoning capability. Moreover, we further evaluate ReST-RL on out-of-domain math and science reasoning tasks, where it achieves improved performance without target-domain tuning and favorable end-to-end efficiency trade-offs, providing preliminary transfer evidence beyond our primary coding domain.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 4 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2025.

Builds on

4 of 38 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Skywork-Reward: Bag of Tricks for Reward Modeling in LLMs24 Oct

Other references · 3

  1. 2024Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Reportcited by 1,203
  2. 2023Beyond Human Data: Scaling Self-Training for Problem-Solving with Language Modelscited by 349
  3. 2024OpenCodeInterpreter: Integrating Code Generation with Execution and Refinementcited by 247

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 7.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024ReST-MCTS*: LLM Self-Training via Process Reward Guided Tree Search
  2. 2025Part I: Tricks or Traps? A Deep Dive into RL for LLM Reasoning
  3. 2025Accelerating RL for LLM Reasoning with Optimal Advantage Regression
  4. 2025Trajectory Bellman Residual Minimization: A Simple Value-Based Method for LLM Reasoning
  5. 2026An RL View of OPD: Least Square Policy Distillation for Sample-Efficient LLM Reasoning
  6. 2025LSPO: Length-aware Dynamic Sampling for Policy Optimization in LLM Reasoning
  7. 2025DGRO: Enhancing LLM Reasoning via Exploration-Exploitation Control and Reward Variance Management
  8. 2025Exploring the Potential of Offline RL for Reasoning in LLMs: A Preliminary Study