CORTEX: Composite Overlay for Risk Tiering and Exposure in Operational AI Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As the deployment of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems in high-stakes sectors - like healthcare, finance, education, justice, and infrastructure has increased - the possibility and impact of failures of these systems have significantly evolved from being a theoretical possibility to practical recurring, systemic risk. This paper introduces CORTEX (Composite Overlay for Risk Tiering and Exposure), a multi-layered risk scoring framework proposed to assess and score AI system vulnerabilities, developed on empirical analysis of over 1,200 incidents documented in the AI Incident Database (AIID), CORTEX categorizes failure modes into 29 technical vulnerability groups. Each vulnerability is scored through a five-tier architecture that combines: (1) utility-adjusted Likelihood x Impact calculations; (2) governance + contextual overlays aligned with regulatory frameworks, such as the EU AI Act, NIST RMF, OECD principles; (3) technical surface scores, covering exposure vectors like drift, traceability, and adversarial risk; (4) environmental and residual modifiers tailored to context of where these systems are being deployed to use; and (5) a final layered assessment via Bayesian risk aggregation and Monte Carlo simulation to model volatility and long-tail risks. The resulting composite score can be operationalized across AI risk registers, model audits, conformity checks, and dynamic governance dashboards.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2025.
Builds on
14 of 72 references.
References · 14
- 2020Preventing Repeated Real World AI Failures by Cataloging Incidents: The AI Incident Databasecited by 96
- 2023Use case cards: a use case reporting framework inspired by the European AI Actcited by 15
- 2022FAIR for AI: An interdisciplinary and international community building perspectivecited by 13
- 2023On (assessing) the fairness of risk score modelscited by 12
- 2025Unlocking the Black Box: Analysing the EU Artificial Intelligence Act's Framework for Explainability in AIcited by 11
- 2020Joint Optimization of AI Fairness and Utility: A Human-Centered Approachcited by 10
- 2022FAIR principles for AI models with a practical application for accelerated high energy diffraction microscopycited by 10
- 2023Towards Concrete and Connected AI Risk Assessment (C2AIRA): A Systematic Mapping Studycited by 9
- 2025Atlas of AI Risks: Enhancing Public Understanding of AI Riskscited by 7
- 2023Towards Conceptualization of "Fair Explanation": Disparate Impacts of anti-Asian Hate Speech Explanations on Content Moderatorscited by 6
- 2024Assessing the Effectiveness of LLMs in Android Application Vulnerability Analysiscited by 6
- 2024An Open Knowledge Graph-Based Approach for Mapping Concepts and Requirements between the EU AI Act and International Standardscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.