mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

"Where does it hurt?" -- Dataset and Study on Physician Intent Trajectories in Doctor Patient Dialogues

arXiv 2508.19077 ↗First posted 26 Aug 2025cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In a doctor-patient dialogue, the primary objective of physicians is to diagnose patients and propose a treatment plan. Medical doctors guide these conversations through targeted questioning to efficiently gather the information required to provide the best possible outcomes for patients. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that studies physician intent trajectories in doctor-patient dialogues. We use the `Ambient Clinical Intelligence Benchmark' (Aci-bench) dataset for our study. We collaborate with medical professionals to develop a fine-grained taxonomy of physician intents based on the SOAP framework (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan). We then conduct a large-scale annotation effort to label over 5000 doctor-patient turns with the help of a large number of medical experts recruited using Prolific, a popular crowd-sourcing platform. This large labeled dataset is an important resource contribution that we use for benchmarking the state-of-the-art generative and encoder models for medical intent classification tasks. Our findings show that our models understand the general structure of medical dialogues with high accuracy, but often fail to identify transitions between SOAP categories. We also report for the first time common trajectories in medical dialogue structures that provide valuable insights for designing `differential diagnosis' systems. Finally, we extensively study the impact of intent filtering for medical dialogue summarization and observe a significant boost in performance. We make the codes and data, including annotation guidelines, publicly available at https://github.com/DATEXIS/medical-intent-classification.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2025.

Builds on

14 of 39 references.

References · 14

  1. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  2. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  3. 2024MDAgents: An Adaptive Collaboration of LLMs for Medical Decision-Makingcited by 163
  4. 2020MedDialog: Two Large-scale Medical Dialogue Datasetscited by 161
  5. 2023ACI-BENCH: a Novel Ambient Clinical Intelligence Dataset for Benchmarking Automatic Visit Note Generationcited by 118
  6. 2020Generating SOAP Notes from Doctor-Patient Conversations Using Modular Summarization Techniquescited by 64
  7. 2022A Benchmark for Automatic Medical Consultation System: Frameworks, Tasks and Datasetscited by 45
  8. 2021Leveraging Pretrained Models for Automatic Summarization of Doctor-Patient Conversationscited by 42
  9. 2022PriMock57: A Dataset Of Primary Care Mock Consultationscited by 31
  10. 2025MEDDxAgent: A Unified Modular Agent Framework for Explainable Automatic Differential Diagnosiscited by 23
  11. 2024MediTOD: An English Dialogue Dataset for Medical History Taking with Comprehensive Annotationscited by 22
  12. 2023Contextualized Medication Information Extraction Using Transformer-based Deep Learning Architecturescited by 8
2 more
  1. 2017Employing Weak Annotations for Medical Image Analysis Problemscited by 7
  2. 2021Can non-specialists provide high quality gold standard labels in challenging modalities?cited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.