mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Stabilizing Open-Set Test-Time Adaptation via Primary-Auxiliary Filtering and Knowledge-Integrated Prediction

arXiv 2508.18751 ↗First posted 26 Aug 2025cs.AI cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks demonstrate strong performance under aligned training-test distributions. However, real-world test data often exhibit domain shifts. Test-Time Adaptation (TTA) addresses this challenge by adapting the model to test data during inference. While most TTA studies assume that the training and test data share the same class set (closed-set TTA), real-world scenarios often involve open-set data (open-set TTA), which can degrade closed-set accuracy. A recent study showed that identifying open-set data during adaptation and maximizing its entropy is an effective solution. However, the previous method relies on the source model for filtering, resulting in suboptimal filtering accuracy on domain-shifted test data. In contrast, we found that the adapting model, which learns domain knowledge from noisy test streams, tends to be unstable and leads to error accumulation when used for filtering. To address this problem, we propose Primary-Auxiliary Filtering (PAF), which employs an auxiliary filter to validate data filtered by the primary filter. Furthermore, we propose Knowledge-Integrated Prediction (KIP), which calibrates the outputs of the adapting model, EMA model, and source model to integrate their complementary knowledge for OSTTA. We validate our approach across diverse closed-set and open-set datasets. Our method enhances both closed-set accuracy and open-set discrimination over existing methods. The code is available at https://github.com/powerpowe/PAF-KIP-OSTTA .

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2025.

Builds on

23 of 31 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  3. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
  4. 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,404
  5. 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 659
  6. 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 520
  7. 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 467
  8. 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Test-Time Adaptation under Distribution Shiftscited by 353
  9. 2018Recent Advances in Open Set Recognition: A Surveycited by 309
  10. 2022Contrastive Test-Time Adaptationcited by 258
  11. 2023Robust Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Scenarioscited by 185
  12. 2022NOTE: Robust Continual Test-time Adaptation Against Temporal Correlationcited by 150
11 more
  1. 2022Robust Mean Teacher for Continual and Gradual Test-Time Adaptationcited by 102
  2. 2022Decorate the Newcomers: Visual Domain Prompt for Continual Test Time Adaptationcited by 98
  3. 2023DELTA: degradation-free fully test-time adaptationcited by 72
  4. 2023SoTTA: Robust Test-Time Adaptation on Noisy Data Streamscited by 63
  5. 2023ViDA: Homeostatic Visual Domain Adapter for Continual Test Time Adaptationcited by 58
  6. 2022A Probabilistic Framework for Lifelong Test-Time Adaptationcited by 44
  7. 2023Towards Open-Set Test-Time Adaptation Utilizing the Wisdom of Crowds in Entropy Minimizationcited by 39
  8. 2022TeST: Test-time Self-Training under Distribution Shiftcited by 29
  9. 2024Unified Entropy Optimization for Open-Set Test-Time Adaptationcited by 17
  10. 2024STAMP: Outlier-Aware Test-Time Adaptation with Stable Memory Replaycited by 13
  11. 2024Un-Mixing Test-Time Normalization Statistics: Combatting Label Temporal Correlationcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.