Thinking Before You Speak: A Proactive Test-time Scaling Approach
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) often exhibit deficiencies with complex reasoning tasks, such as maths, which we attribute to the discrepancy between human reasoning patterns and those presented in the LLMs' training data. When dealing with complex problems, humans tend to think carefully before expressing solutions. However, they often do not articulate their inner thoughts, including their intentions and chosen methodologies. Consequently, critical insights essential for bridging reasoning steps may be absent in training data collected from human sources. To bridge this gap, we proposes inserting insights between consecutive reasoning steps, which review the status and initiate the next reasoning steps. Unlike prior prompting strategies that rely on a single or a workflow of static prompts to facilitate reasoning, insights are proactively generated to guide reasoning processes. We implement our idea as a reasoning framework, named Thinking Before You Speak (TBYS), and design a pipeline for automatically collecting and filtering in-context examples for the generation of insights, which alleviates human labeling efforts and fine-tuning overheads. Experiments on challenging mathematical datasets verify the effectiveness of TBYS. Project website: https://gitee.com/jswrt/TBYS
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 10 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2025.
Builds on
10 of 38 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Disentangling Memory and Reasoning Ability in Large Language Models20 Nov
- 2024Mutual Reasoning Makes Smaller LLMs Stronger Problem-Solvers12 Aug
Other references · 8
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
- 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,120
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,986
- 2022Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 1,407
- 2025s1: Simple test-time scalingcited by 1,341
- 2025A Survey on Test-Time Scaling in Large Language Models: What, How, Where, and How Well?cited by 223
- 2024Buffer of Thoughts: Thought-Augmented Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 91
- 2025START: Self-taught Reasoner with Toolscited by 47
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Thinking About Thinking: Evaluating Reasoning in Post-Trained Language Models
- 2025Reasoning Strategies in Large Language Models: Can They Follow, Prefer, and Optimize?
- 2025Effectively Controlling Reasoning Models through Thinking Intervention
- 2025Beyond Chains of Thought: Benchmarking Latent-Space Reasoning Abilities in Large Language Models
- 2025On the Thinking-Language Modeling Gap in Large Language Models
- 2025THiNK: Can Large Language Models Think-aloud?
- 2025Advancing Reasoning in Large Language Models: Promising Methods and Approaches
- 2026PRISM: A Dual View of LLM Reasoning through Semantic Flow and Latent Computation