Detecting and Characterizing Planning in Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance across a wide range of multi-step reasoning tasks. Recent work suggests that LLMs may perform planning - selecting a future target token in advance and generating intermediate tokens that lead towards it - rather than merely improvising one token at a time. However, existing studies assume fixed planning horizons and often focus on single prompts or narrow domains. To distinguish planning from improvisation across models and tasks, we present formal and causally grounded criteria for detecting planning and operationalize them as a semi-automated annotation pipeline. We apply this pipeline to both base and instruction-tuned Gemma-2-2B models on the MBPP code generation benchmark and a poem generation task where Claude 3.5 Haiku was previously shown to plan. Our findings show that planning is not universal: unlike Haiku, Gemma-2-2B solves the same poem generation task through improvisation, and on MBPP it switches between planning and improvisation across similar tasks and even successive token predictions. We further show that instruction tuning refines existing planning behaviors in the base model rather than creating them from scratch. Together, these studies provide a reproducible and scalable foundation for mechanistic studies of planning in LLMs.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2025.
Builds on
13 of 22 references.
References · 13
- 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
- 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 435
- 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2cited by 394
- 2013Direct and Indirect Effectscited by 280
- 2021Causal Analysis of Syntactic Agreement Mechanisms in Neural Language Modelscited by 131
- 2023Future Lens: Anticipating Subsequent Tokens from a Single Hidden Statecited by 121
- 2024AtP*: An efficient and scalable method for localizing LLM behaviour to componentscited by 111
- 2024Do language models plan ahead for future tokens?cited by 49
- 2024Evidence of Learned Look-Ahead in a Chess-Playing Neural Networkcited by 34
- 2025Interpreting Emergent Planning in Model-Free Reinforcement Learningcited by 15
1 more
- 2024Extracting Paragraphs from LLM Token Activationscited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
- 2026Temporal Preference Concepts and their Functions in a Large Language Modelcited by 0
- 2026LLMs Can Annotate Attribution Graphscited by 0
- 2026LLMs Can Annotate Attribution Graphs28 Jul 2026
- 2026Temporal Preference Concepts and their Functions in a Large Language Model11 May 2026