Limitations of Normalization in Attention Mechanism
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper investigates the limitations of the normalization in attention mechanisms. We begin with a theoretical framework that enables the identification of the model's selective ability and the geometric separation involved in token selection. Our analysis includes explicit bounds on distances and separation criteria for token vectors under softmax scaling. Through experiments with pre-trained GPT-2 model, we empirically validate our theoretical results and analyze key behaviors of the attention mechanism. Notably, we demonstrate that as the number of selected tokens increases, the model's ability to distinguish informative tokens declines, often converging toward a uniform selection pattern. We also show that gradient sensitivity under softmax normalization presents challenges during training, especially at low temperature settings. These findings advance current understanding of softmax-based attention mechanism and motivate the need for more robust normalization and selection strategies in future attention architectures.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2025.
Builds on
14 of 21 references.
References · 14
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
- 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,362
- 2019ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 2,219
- 2019Transformer-XL: Attentive Language Models Beyond a Fixed-Length Contextcited by 1,830
- 2020Big Bird: Transformers for Longer Sequencescited by 1,673
- 2020Reformer: The Efficient Transformercited by 1,658
- 2019Generating Long Sequences with Sparse Transformerscited by 1,523
- 2019Compressive Transformers for Long-Range Sequence Modellingcited by 699
- 2014Neural Turing Machinescited by 630
2 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 5.
7 papers.
- 2025Expected Attention: KV Cache Compression by Estimating Attention from Future Queries Distributioncited by 70
- 2026Evaluating Memory Capability in Continuous Lifelog Scenariocited by 3
- 2026Geometric Analysis of Token Selection in Multi-Head Attentioncited by 1
- 2025Performance-Efficiency Tradeoffs in Transformers: An Approximation Theory Perspectivecited by 0
- 2026Sessa: Selective State Space Attentioncited by 0
- 2026You Don't Need Attention: Gated Convolutional Modeling for Watch-Based Fall Detectioncited by 0
- 2026A Systematic Benchmark of Explainable Methods for Temporal Attribution in Sequential Recommendation Systemscited by 0
- 2026A Systematic Benchmark of Explainable Methods for Temporal Attribution in Sequential Recommendation Systems23 Sep 2026
- 2026You Don't Need Attention: Gated Convolutional Modeling for Watch-Based Fall Detection19 May 2026
- 2026Sessa: Selective State Space Attention20 Apr 2026
- 2026Evaluating Memory Capability in Continuous Lifelog Scenario13 Apr 2026
- 2026Geometric Analysis of Token Selection in Multi-Head Attention2 Feb 2026
- 2025Performance-Efficiency Tradeoffs in Transformers: An Approximation Theory Perspective4 Oct 2025
- 2025Expected Attention: KV Cache Compression by Estimating Attention from Future Queries Distribution1 Oct 2025