mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Limitations of Normalization in Attention Mechanism

arXiv 2508.17821 ↗First posted 25 Aug 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper investigates the limitations of the normalization in attention mechanisms. We begin with a theoretical framework that enables the identification of the model's selective ability and the geometric separation involved in token selection. Our analysis includes explicit bounds on distances and separation criteria for token vectors under softmax scaling. Through experiments with pre-trained GPT-2 model, we empirically validate our theoretical results and analyze key behaviors of the attention mechanism. Notably, we demonstrate that as the number of selected tokens increases, the model's ability to distinguish informative tokens declines, often converging toward a uniform selection pattern. We also show that gradient sensitivity under softmax normalization presents challenges during training, especially at low temperature settings. These findings advance current understanding of softmax-based attention mechanism and motivate the need for more robust normalization and selection strategies in future attention architectures.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2025.

Builds on

14 of 21 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  4. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  5. 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,362
  6. 2019ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 2,219
  7. 2019Transformer-XL: Attentive Language Models Beyond a Fixed-Length Contextcited by 1,830
  8. 2020Big Bird: Transformers for Longer Sequencescited by 1,673
  9. 2020Reformer: The Efficient Transformercited by 1,658
  10. 2019Generating Long Sequences with Sparse Transformerscited by 1,523
  11. 2019Compressive Transformers for Long-Range Sequence Modellingcited by 699
  12. 2014Neural Turing Machinescited by 630
2 more
  1. 2016From Softmax to Sparsemax: A Sparse Model of Attention and Multi-Label Classificationcited by 337
  2. 2017Breaking the Softmax Bottleneck: A High-Rank RNN Language Modelcited by 147

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 5.

7 papers.