From Global to Local: Social Bias Transfer in CLIP
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The recycling of contrastive language-image pre-trained (CLIP) models as backbones for a large number of downstream tasks calls for a thorough analysis of their transferability implications, especially their well-documented reproduction of social biases and human stereotypes. How do such biases, learned during pre-training, propagate to downstream applications like visual question answering or image captioning? Do they transfer at all? We investigate this phenomenon, referred to as bias transfer in prior literature, through a comprehensive empirical analysis. Firstly, we examine how pre-training bias varies between global and local views of data, finding that bias measurement is highly dependent on the subset of data on which it is computed. Secondly, we analyze correlations between biases in the pre-trained models and the downstream tasks across varying levels of pre-training bias, finding difficulty in discovering consistent trends in bias transfer. Finally, we explore why this inconsistency occurs, showing that under the current paradigm, representation spaces of different pre-trained CLIPs tend to converge when adapted for downstream tasks. We hope this work offers valuable insights into bias behavior and informs future research to promote better bias mitigation practices.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 50 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2025.
Builds on
50 of 59 references.
References · 50
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
- 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,386
- 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,288
- 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,152
- 2022InstructPix2Pix: Learning to Follow Image Editing Instructionscited by 2,611
- 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,516
- 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,506
- 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,046
38 more
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
- 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,917
- 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,718
- 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,247
- 2022Null-text Inversion for Editing Real Images using Guided Diffusion Modelscited by 1,179
- 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,173
- 2019OK-VQA: A Visual Question Answering Benchmark Requiring External Knowledgecited by 1,121
- 2014Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptionscited by 968
- 2014Show and Tell: A Neural Image Caption Generatorcited by 879
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2022A-OKVQA: A Benchmark for Visual Question Answering using World Knowledgecited by 710
- 2018Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representationscited by 353
- 2021Multimodal datasets: misogyny, pornography, and malignant stereotypescited by 327
- 2023Interpreting CLIP's Image Representation via Text-Based Decompositioncited by 196
- 2023Debiasing Vision-Language Models via Biased Promptscited by 149
- 2019Inherent Tradeoffs in Learning Fair Representationscited by 144
- 2019Fairness-Aware Ranking in Search & Recommendation Systems with Application to LinkedIn Talent Searchcited by 138
- 2021Evaluating CLIP: Towards Characterization of Broader Capabilities and Downstream Implicationscited by 128
- 2014From Captions to Visual Concepts and Backcited by 109
- 2021Understanding and Evaluating Racial Biases in Image Captioningcited by 108
- 2022A Prompt Array Keeps the Bias Away: Debiasing Vision-Language Models with Adversarial Learningcited by 104
- 2021Are Gender-Neutral Queries Really Gender-Neutral? Mitigating Gender Bias in Image Searchcited by 90
- 2021Directional Bias Amplificationcited by 54
- 2023Uncurated Image-Text Datasets: Shedding Light on Demographic Biascited by 52
- 2022Contrastive Language-Vision AI Models Pretrained on Web-Scraped Multimodal Data Exhibit Sexual Objectification Biascited by 43
- 2022American == White in Multimodal Language-and-Image AIcited by 39
- 2022Gender Artifacts in Visual Datasetscited by 38
- 2022Quantifying Societal Bias Amplification in Image Captioningcited by 37
- 2023Overwriting Pretrained Bias with Finetuning Datacited by 32
- 2022Markedness in Visual Semantic AIcited by 29
- 2024FairerCLIP: Debiasing CLIP's Zero-Shot Predictions using Functions in RKHSscited by 25
- 2017Provably Fair Representationscited by 22
- 2021Fair Representation: Guaranteeing Approximate Multiple Group Fairness for Unknown Taskscited by 16
- 2024Utility-Fairness Trade-Offs and How to Find Themcited by 15
- 2023Evaluating Bias and Fairness in Gender-Neutral Pretrained Vision-and-Language Modelscited by 6
- 2025Biases Propagate in Encoder-based Vision-Language Models: A Systematic Analysis From Intrinsic Measures to Zero-shot Retrieval Outcomescited by 6
- 2023Gender Bias in Multimodal Models: A Transnational Feminist Approach Considering Geographical Region and Culturecited by 5
- 2024The Bias of Harmful Label Associations in Vision-Language Modelscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.