Provable Generalization in Overparameterized Neural Nets
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neural networks often contain far more parameters than training examples, yet they still manage to generalize well in practice. Classical complexity measures such as VC-dimension or PAC-Bayes bounds usually become vacuous in this overparameterized regime, offering little explanation for the empirical success of models like Transformers. In this work, I explore an alternative notion of capacity for attention-based models, based on the effective rank of their attention matrices. The intuition is that, although the parameter count is enormous, the functional dimensionality of attention is often much lower. I show that this quantity leads to a generalization bound whose dependence on sample size matches empirical scaling laws observed in large language models, up to logarithmic factors. While the analysis is not a complete theory of overparameterized learning, it provides evidence that spectral properties of attention, rather than raw parameter counts, may be the right lens for understanding why these models generalize.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2025.
Builds on
8 of 12 references.
References · 8
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
- 2015An Introduction to Matrix Concentration Inequalitiescited by 397
- 2021Explaining Neural Scaling Lawscited by 363
- 2018Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Linear Convolutional Networkscited by 251
- 2017The Power of Interpolation: Understanding the Effectiveness of SGD in Modern Over-parametrized Learningcited by 150
- 2016A vector-contraction inequality for Rademacher complexitiescited by 142
Built on by
Not cited yet.