mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Natural Language Satisfiability: Exploring the Problem Distribution and Evaluating Transformer-based Language Models

arXiv 2508.17153 ↗First posted 23 Aug 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Efforts to apply transformer-based language models (TLMs) to the problem of reasoning in natural language have enjoyed ever-increasing success in recent years. The most fundamental task in this area to which nearly all others can be reduced is that of determining satisfiability. However, from a logical point of view, satisfiability problems vary along various dimensions, which may affect TLMs' ability to learn how to solve them. The problem instances of satisfiability in natural language can belong to different computational complexity classes depending on the language fragment in which they are expressed. Although prior research has explored the problem of natural language satisfiability, the above-mentioned point has not been discussed adequately. Hence, we investigate how problem instances from varying computational complexity classes and having different grammatical constructs impact TLMs' ability to learn rules of inference. Furthermore, to faithfully evaluate TLMs, we conduct an empirical study to explore the distribution of satisfiability problems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 33 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2025.

Builds on

33 of 54 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivity8 Feb

Other references · 32

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  4. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  5. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  6. 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,362
  7. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
  8. 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,201
  9. 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,242
  10. 2021DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharingcited by 1,219
  11. 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
  12. 2020ProofWriter: Generating Implications, Proofs, and Abductive Statements over Natural Languagecited by 309
20 more
  1. 2020Transformers as Soft Reasoners over Languagecited by 265
  2. 2018Learning a SAT Solver from Single-Bit Supervisioncited by 198
  3. 2019What Can Neural Networks Reason About?cited by 155
  4. 2018Breaking NLI Systems with Sentences that Require Simple Lexical Inferencescited by 134
  5. 2021NaturalProofs: Mathematical Theorem Proving in Natural Languagecited by 80
  6. 2019Reasoning Over Paragraph Effects in Situationscited by 79
  7. 2019Probing Natural Language Inference Models through Semantic Fragmentscited by 64
  8. 2018A Survey on Semantic Parsingcited by 62
  9. 2020PRover: Proof Generation for Interpretable Reasoning over Rulescited by 53
  10. 2020Probing Linguistic Systematicitycited by 37
  11. 2019NLProlog: Reasoning with Weak Unification for Question Answering in Natural Languagecited by 36
  12. 2019Differentiable Product Quantization for End-to-End Embedding Compressioncited by 36
  13. 2019Differentiable Reasoning on Large Knowledge Bases and Natural Languagecited by 30
  14. 2020Do Neural Models Learn Systematicity of Monotonicity Inference in Natural Language?cited by 29
  15. 2018Can Neural Networks Understand Logical Entailment?cited by 24
  16. 2019Establishing Strong Baselines for the New Decade: Sequence Tagging, Syntactic and Semantic Parsing with BERTcited by 19
  17. 2021ReaSCAN: Compositional Reasoning in Language Groundingcited by 19
  18. 2021Pushing the Limits of Rule Reasoning in Transformers through Natural Language Satisfiabilitycited by 18
  19. 2019Synthetic Datasets for Neural Program Synthesiscited by 15
  20. 2018Stress-Testing Neural Models of Natural Language Inference with Multiply-Quantified Sentencescited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022Can Transformers Reason in Fragments of Natural Language?
  2. 2023SatLM: Satisfiability-Aided Language Models Using Declarative Prompting
  3. 2025SATBench: Benchmarking LLMs' Logical Reasoning via Automated Puzzle Generation from SAT Formulas
  4. 2024Can Large Language Models Reason? A Characterization via 3-SAT
  5. 2024Can Transformers Reason Logically? A Study in SAT Solving
  6. 2026Neurosymbolic Language Reasoning as Satisfiability Modulo Theory
  7. 2025ReliableMath: Benchmark of Reliable Mathematical Reasoning on Large Language Models
  8. 2025Saturation-Driven Dataset Generation for LLM Mathematical Reasoning in the TPTP Ecosystem