mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Dimensional Collapse in Transformer Attention Outputs: A Challenge for Sparse Dictionary Learning

arXiv 2508.16929 ↗First posted 23 Aug 2025cs.LG cs.CLcited by 6

On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Transformer architectures, and their attention mechanisms in particular, form the foundation of modern large language models. While transformer models are widely believed to operate in high-dimensional hidden spaces, we show that attention outputs are in fact confined to a surprisingly low-dimensional subspace, with an effective dimensionality of only about 60% of the full space. In contrast, MLP outputs and residual streams remain much closer to full-rank, exhibiting effective ranks around 90%. This striking dimensional discrepancy is consistently observed across diverse model families and datasets, and is strongly shaped by the attention output projection matrix. Critically, we find this low-rank structure as a key factor of the prevalent dead feature problem in sparse dictionary learning, where it creates a mismatch between randomly initialized features and the intrinsic geometry of the activation space. Building on this insight, we propose a subspace-constrained training method for sparse autoencoders (SAEs), initializing feature directions into the active subspace of activations. Our approach reduces dead features from 87% to below 1% in Attention Output SAEs with 1M features, and can further extend to other sparse dictionary learning methods. Our findings provide both new insights into the geometry of attention and practical tools for improving sparse dictionary learning in large language models.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 31 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2025.

Builds on

31 of 52 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Efficient Dictionary Learning with Switch Sparse Autoencoders10 Oct
  2. 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 29 Aug
  3. 2022Toy Models of Superposition21 Sep

Other references · 28

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  3. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
  4. 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,165
  5. 2022In-context Learning and Induction Headscited by 964
  6. 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 716
  7. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
  8. 2021Understanding Dimensional Collapse in Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 378
  9. 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoderscited by 300
  10. 2021Understanding self-supervised Learning Dynamics without Contrastive Pairscited by 256
  11. 2019A Study of BFLOAT16 for Deep Learning Trainingcited by 232
  12. 2024Transcoders Find Interpretable LLM Feature Circuitscited by 200
16 more
  1. 2024Improving Dictionary Learning with Gated Sparse Autoencoderscited by 179
  2. 2016Linear Algebraic Structure of Word Senses, with Applications to Polysemycited by 165
  3. 2021On Feature Decorrelation in Self-Supervised Learningcited by 160
  4. 2023A Toy Model of Universality: Reverse Engineering How Networks Learn Group Operationscited by 144
  5. 2024Llama Scope: Extracting Millions of Features from Llama-3.1-8B with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 143
  6. 2024Universal Neurons in GPT2 Language Modelscited by 102
  7. 2020Low-Rank Bottleneck in Multi-head Attention Modelscited by 89
  8. 2023Successor Heads: Recurring, Interpretable Attention Heads In The Wildcited by 77
  9. 2020Fixed Encoder Self-Attention Patterns in Transformer-Based Machine Translationcited by 43
  10. 2024Towards Universality: Studying Mechanistic Similarity Across Language Model Architecturescited by 31
  11. 2024An X-Ray Is Worth 15 Features: Sparse Autoencoders for Interpretable Radiology Report Generationcited by 25
  12. 2024Automatically Identifying Local and Global Circuits with Linear Computation Graphscited by 24
  13. 2024Small Singular Values Matter: A Random Matrix Analysis of Transformer Modelscited by 21
  14. 2023Sparse Distributed Memory is a Continual Learnercited by 11
  15. 2025Towards Understanding the Nature of Attention with Low-Rank Sparse Decompositioncited by 9
  16. 2025Principal Components for Neural Network Initializationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Subspace-Aware Sparse Autoencoders for Effective Mechanistic Interpretability
  2. 2024Interpreting Attention Layer Outputs with Sparse Autoencoders
  3. 2025DB-KSVD: Scalable Alternating Optimization for Disentangling High-Dimensional Embedding Spaces
  4. 2024Features that Make a Difference: Leveraging Gradients for Improved Dictionary Learning
  5. 2026Scaling Attention via Feature Sparsity
  6. 2026Sparsity as a Key: Unlocking New Insights from Latent Structures for Out-of-Distribution Detection
  7. 2026Causal Dimensionality of Transformer Representations: Measurement, Scaling, and Layer Structure
  8. 2025Empirical Evaluation of Progressive Coding for Sparse Autoencoders