mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

UM3: Unsupervised Map to Map Matching

arXiv 2508.16874 ↗First posted 23 Aug 2025cs.LG cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Map-to-map matching is a critical task for aligning spatial data across heterogeneous sources, yet it remains challenging due to the lack of ground truth correspondences, sparse node features, and scalability demands. In this paper, we propose an unsupervised graph-based framework that addresses these challenges through three key innovations. First, our method is an unsupervised learning approach that requires no training data, which is crucial for large-scale map data where obtaining labeled training samples is challenging. Second, we introduce pseudo coordinates that capture the relative spatial layout of nodes within each map, which enhances feature discriminability and enables scale-invariant learning. Third, we design an mechanism to adaptively balance feature and geometric similarity, as well as a geometric-consistent loss function, ensuring robustness to noisy or incomplete coordinate data. At the implementation level, to handle large-scale maps, we develop a tile-based post-processing pipeline with overlapping regions and majority voting, which enables parallel processing while preserving boundary coherence. Experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art accuracy in matching tasks, surpassing existing methods by a large margin, particularly in high-noise and large-scale scenarios. Our framework provides a scalable and practical solution for map alignment, offering a robust and efficient alternative to traditional approaches.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2025.

Builds on

13 of 46 references.

References · 13

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,248
  3. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
  4. 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,316
  5. 2019SuperGlue: Learning Feature Matching with Graph Neural Networkscited by 1,443
  6. 2019Deep Closest Point: Learning Representations for Point Cloud Registrationcited by 321
  7. 2019PointNetLK: Robust & Efficient Point Cloud Registration using PointNetcited by 233
  8. 2020Deep Graph Matching Consensuscited by 85
  9. 2019Neural Graph Matching Network: Learning Lawler's Quadratic Assignment Problem with Extension to Hypergraph and Multiple-graph Matchingcited by 84
  10. 2020Deep Graph Matching via Blackbox Differentiation of Combinatorial Solverscited by 81
  11. 2024Boosting Graph Pooling with Persistent Homologycited by 9
  12. 2024Micro-Macro Spatial-Temporal Graph-based Encoder-Decoder for Map-Constrained Trajectory Recoverycited by 9
1 more
  1. 2025Neural Graduated Assignment for Maximum Common Edge Subgraphscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.