Wormhole Dynamics in Deep Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This work investigates the generalization behavior of deep neural networks (DNNs), focusing on the phenomenon of "fooling examples," where DNNs confidently classify inputs that appear random or unstructured to humans. To explore this phenomenon, we introduce an analytical framework based on maximum likelihood estimation, without adhering to conventional numerical approaches that rely on gradient-based optimization and explicit labels. Our analysis reveals that DNNs operating in an overparameterized regime exhibit a collapse in the output feature space. While this collapse improves network generalization, adding more layers eventually leads to a state of degeneracy, where the model learns trivial solutions by mapping distinct inputs to the same output, resulting in zero loss. Further investigation demonstrates that this degeneracy can be bypassed using our newly derived "wormhole" solution. The wormhole solution, when applied to arbitrary fooling examples, reconciles meaningful labels with random ones and provides a novel perspective on shortcut learning. These findings offer deeper insights into DNN generalization and highlight directions for future research on learning dynamics in unsupervised settings to bridge the gap between theory and practice.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2025.
Builds on
29 of 44 references.
References · 29
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
- 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,337
- 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,321
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
- 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 774
- 2013Exact solutions to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networkscited by 748
- 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 713
- 2017Exploring Generalization in Deep Learningcited by 595
- 2019Implicit Regularization in Deep Matrix Factorizationcited by 402
- 2020The Pitfalls of Simplicity Bias in Neural Networkscited by 349
- 2018On the Optimization of Deep Networks: Implicit Acceleration by Overparameterizationcited by 280
17 more
- 2019SGD on Neural Networks Learns Functions of Increasing Complexitycited by 203
- 2018A Convergence Analysis of Gradient Descent for Deep Linear Neural Networkscited by 180
- 2020What shapes feature representations? Exploring datasets, architectures, and trainingcited by 125
- 2021Implicit Bias of SGD for Diagonal Linear Networks: a Provable Benefit of Stochasticitycited by 107
- 2022Neural Collapse: A Review on Modelling Principles and Generalizationcited by 95
- 2023On the Foundations of Shortcut Learningcited by 64
- 2021Stochastic Training is Not Necessary for Generalizationcited by 63
- 2018Adversarial Examples: Opportunities and Challengescited by 62
- 2019Learning deep linear neural networks: Riemannian gradient flows and convergence to global minimizerscited by 61
- 2021Which Shortcut Cues Will DNNs Choose? A Study from the Parameter-Space Perspectivecited by 56
- 2022Implicit Bias in Leaky ReLU Networks Trained on High-Dimensional Datacited by 46
- 2024Neural Redshift: Random Networks are not Random Functionscited by 43
- 2020Gradient Descent for Deep Matrix Factorization: Dynamics and Implicit Bias towards Low Rankcited by 42
- 2021Convergence of gradient descent for learning linear neural networkscited by 22
- 2013Big Neural Networks Waste Capacitycited by 10
- 2018FinBrain: When Finance Meets AI 2.0cited by 10
- 2023Robustified ANNs Reveal Wormholes Between Human Category Perceptscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.