A Fuzzy-Enhanced Explainable AI Framework for Flight Continuous Descent Operations Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) involve smooth, idle-thrust descents that avoid level-offs, reducing fuel burn, emissions, and noise while improving efficiency and passenger comfort. Despite its operational and environmental benefits, limited research has systematically examined the factors influencing CDO performance. Moreover, many existing methods in related areas, such as trajectory optimization, lack the transparency required in aviation, where explainability is critical for safety and stakeholder trust. This study addresses these gaps by proposing a Fuzzy-Enhanced Explainable AI (FEXAI) framework that integrates fuzzy logic with machine learning and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis. For this purpose, a comprehensive dataset of 29 features, including 11 operational and 18 weather-related features, was collected from 1,094 flights using Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) data. Machine learning models and SHAP were then applied to classify flights' CDO adherence levels and rank features by importance. The three most influential features, as identified by SHAP scores, were then used to construct a fuzzy rule-based classifier, enabling the extraction of interpretable fuzzy rules. All models achieved classification accuracies above 90%, with FEXAI providing meaningful, human-readable rules for operational users. Results indicated that the average descent rate within the arrival route, the number of descent segments, and the average change in directional heading during descent were the strongest predictors of CDO performance. The FEXAI method proposed in this study presents a novel pathway for operational decision support and could be integrated into aviation tools to enable real-time advisories that maintain CDO adherence under varying operational conditions.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2025.
Builds on
5 of 50 references.
References · 5
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
- 2021Do Feature Attribution Methods Correctly Attribute Features?cited by 98
- 2024An efficient machine learning approach for extracting eSports players distinguishing features and classifying their skill levels using symbolic transfer entropy and consensus nested cross validationcited by 1
- 2025Predictors of Childhood Vaccination Uptake in England: An Explainable Machine Learning Analysis of Longitudinal Regional Data (2021-2024)cited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.