Enriching Moral Perspectives on AI: Concepts of Trust amongst Africans
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The trustworthiness of AI is considered essential to the adoption and application of AI systems. However, the meaning of trust varies across industry, research and policy spaces. Studies suggest that professionals who develop and use AI regard an AI system as trustworthy based on their personal experiences and social relations at work. Studies about trust in AI and the constructs that aim to operationalise trust in AI (e.g., consistency, reliability, explainability and accountability). However, the majority of existing studies about trust in AI are situated in Western, Educated, Industrialised, Rich and Democratic (WEIRD) societies. The few studies about trust and AI in Africa do not include the views of people who develop, study or use AI in their work. In this study, we surveyed 157 people with professional and/or educational interests in AI from 25 African countries, to explore how they conceptualised trust in AI. Most respondents had links with workshops about trust and AI in Africa in Namibia and Ghana. Respondents' educational background, transnational mobility, and country of origin influenced their concerns about AI systems. These factors also affected their levels of distrust in certain AI applications and their emphasis on specific principles designed to foster trust. Respondents often expressed that their values are guided by the communities in which they grew up and emphasised communal relations over individual freedoms. They described trust in many ways, including applying nuances of Afro-relationalism to constructs in international discourse, such as reliability and reliance. Thus, our exploratory study motivates more empirical research about the ways trust is practically enacted and experienced in African social realities of AI design, use and governance.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 96 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2025.
Builds on
10 of 96 references.
References · 10
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
- 2022Easily Accessible Text-to-Image Generation Amplifies Demographic Stereotypes at Large Scalecited by 262
- 2020Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AIcited by 167
- 2022Power to the People? Opportunities and Challenges for Participatory AIcited by 138
- 2019The relationship between trust in AI and trustworthy machine learning technologiescited by 78
- 2022Accountability in an Algorithmic Society: Relationality, Responsibility, and Robustness in Machine Learningcited by 48
- 2023WEIRD FAccTs: How Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic is FAccT?cited by 28
- 2021Narratives and Counternarratives on Data Sharing in Africacited by 14
- 2022Four Years of FAccT: A Reflexive, Mixed-Methods Analysis of Research Contributions, Shortcomings, and Future Prospectscited by 14
- 2022Requirements Engineering for Artificial Intelligence Systems: A Systematic Mapping Studycited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.