Research on Conversational Recommender System Considering Consumer Types
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Conversational Recommender Systems (CRS) provide personalized services through multi-turn interactions, yet most existing methods overlook users' heterogeneous decision-making styles and knowledge levels, which constrains both accuracy and efficiency. To address this gap, we propose CT-CRS (Consumer Type-Enhanced Conversational Recommender System), a framework that integrates consumer type modeling into dialogue recommendation. Based on consumer type theory, we define four user categories--dependent, efficient, cautious, and expert--derived from two dimensions: decision-making style (maximizers vs. satisficers) and knowledge level (high vs. low). CT-CRS employs interaction histories and fine-tunes the large language model to automatically infer user types in real time, avoiding reliance on static questionnaires. We incorporate user types into state representation and design a type-adaptive policy that dynamically adjusts recommendation granularity, diversity, and attribute query complexity. To further optimize the dialogue policy, we adopt Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL), enabling the agent to approximate expert-like strategies conditioned on consumer type. Experiments on LastFM, Amazon-Book, and Yelp show that CTCRS improves recommendation success rate and reduces interaction turns compared to strong baselines. Ablation studies confirm that both consumer type modeling and IRL contribute significantly to performance gains. These results demonstrate that CT-CRS offers a scalable and interpretable solution for enhancing CRS personalization through the integration of psychological modeling and advanced policy optimization.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2025.
Builds on
6 of 38 references.
References · 6
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2020Estimation-Action-Reflection: Towards Deep Interaction Between Conversational and Recommender Systemscited by 98
- 2020Interactive Path Reasoning on Graph for Conversational Recommendationcited by 72
- 2021Unified Conversational Recommendation Policy Learning via Graph-based Reinforcement Learningcited by 51
- 2021Learning to Ask Appropriate Questions in Conversational Recommendationcited by 35
- 2021Multiple Choice Questions based Multi-Interest Policy Learning for Conversational Recommendationcited by 20
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Reinforced Strategy Optimization for Conversational Recommender Systems via Network-of-Experts
- 2025Evaluating Conversational Recommender Systems via Large Language Models: A User-Centric Framework
- 2026When and How to Ask: Dynamic Preference Elicitation Strategies for Conversational Recommendation ↗
- 2025Optimizing Conversational Product Recommendation via Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Ask to Be Sure: Informative Interactions for Confident Multi-Turn LLM Recommendation
- 2025A Framework for Generating Conversational Recommendation Datasets from Behavioral Interactions
- 2025RecUserSim: A Realistic and Diverse User Simulator for Evaluating Conversational Recommender Systems
- 2026User Simulator-Guided Multi-Turn Preference Optimization for Reasoning LLM-based Conversational Recommendation