mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

LLMs Struggle with NLI for Perfect Aspect: A Cross-Linguistic Study in Chinese and Japanese

arXiv 2508.11927 ↗First posted 16 Aug 2025cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Unlike English, which uses distinct forms (e.g., had, has, will have) to mark the perfect aspect across tenses, Chinese and Japanese lack separate grammatical forms for tense within the perfect aspect, which complicates Natural Language Inference (NLI). Focusing on the perfect aspect in these languages, we construct a linguistically motivated, template-based NLI dataset (1,350 pairs per language). Experiments reveal that even advanced LLMs struggle with temporal inference, particularly in detecting subtle tense and reference-time shifts. These findings highlight model limitations and underscore the need for cross-linguistic evaluation in temporal semantics. Our dataset is available at https://github.com/Lujie2001/CrossNLI.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2025.

Builds on

4 of 13 references.

References · 4

  1. 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 876
  2. 2020OCNLI: Original Chinese Natural Language Inferencecited by 86
  3. 2022Compositional Evaluation on Japanese Textual Entailment and Similaritycited by 14
  4. 2019Temporal and Aspectual Entailmentcited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.