mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Integrating Symbolic RL Planning into a BDI-based Autonomous UAV Framework: System Integration and SIL Validation

arXiv 2508.11890 ↗First posted 16 Aug 2025cs.RO cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL for robot navigation and UAV control

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern autonomous drone missions increasingly require software frameworks capable of seamlessly integrating structured symbolic planning with adaptive reinforcement learning (RL). Although traditional rule-based architectures offer robust structured reasoning for drone autonomy, their capabilities fall short in dynamically complex operational environments that require adaptive symbolic planning. Symbolic RL (SRL), using the Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL), explicitly integrates domain-specific knowledge and operational constraints, significantly improving the reliability and safety of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) decision making. In this study, we propose the AMAD-SRL framework, an extended and refined version of the Autonomous Mission Agents for Drones (AMAD) cognitive multi-agent architecture, enhanced with symbolic reinforcement learning for dynamic mission planning and execution. We validated our framework in a Software-in-the-Loop (SIL) environment structured identically to an intended Hardware-In-the-Loop Simulation (HILS) platform, ensuring seamless transition to real hardware. Experimental results demonstrate stable integration and interoperability of modules, successful transitions between BDI-driven and symbolic RL-driven planning phases, and consistent mission performance. Specifically, we evaluate a target acquisition scenario in which the UAV plans a surveillance path followed by a dynamic reentry path to secure the target while avoiding threat zones. In this SIL evaluation, mission efficiency improved by approximately 75% over a coverage-based baseline, measured by travel distance reduction. This study establishes a robust foundation for handling complex UAV missions and discusses directions for further enhancement and validation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL for robot navigation and UAV control, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 5 of its 9 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2025.

Builds on

5 of 9 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025A Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning Framework for Multi-UAV Combat Using Leader-Follower Strategy22 Jan
  2. 2025Application of Deep Reinforcement Learning to UAV Swarming for Ground Surveillance15 Jan

Other references · 3

  1. 2020PDDLGym: Gym Environments from PDDL Problemscited by 45
  2. 2020Generalized Planning With Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 35
  3. 2023Neurosymbolic Reinforcement Learning and Planning: A Surveycited by 24

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025CORB-Planner: Corridor as Observations for RL Planning in High-Speed Flight
  2. 2026Neuro-Symbolic Agentic AI for Networked Low-Altitude UAVs
  3. 2025UAVs Meet Agentic AI: A Multidomain Survey of Autonomous Aerial Intelligence and Agentic UAVs
  4. 2025Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Point-to-Point UAV Navigation
  5. 2026Intelligent Three Level Learning Architecture for Autonomous UAV Swarms in Search and Rescue
  6. 2026Complex Autonomous UAV Task Execution and Decision-Making With s(CASP) ↗
  7. 2026RL-STPA: Adapting System-Theoretic Hazard Analysis for Safety-Critical Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2024Probabilistic Mission Design for Neuro-Symbolic Unmanned Aircraft Systems