mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Explainable Deep Neural Network for Multimodal ECG Signals: Intermediate vs Late Fusion

arXiv 2508.11666 ↗First posted 6 Aug 2025eess.SP cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The limitations of unimodal deep learning models, particularly their tendency to overfit and limited generalizability, have renewed interest in multimodal fusion strategies. Multimodal deep neural networks (MDNN) have the capability of integrating diverse data domains and offer a promising solution for robust and accurate predictions. However, the optimal fusion strategy, intermediate fusion (feature-level) versus late fusion (decision-level) remains insufficiently examined, especially in high-stakes clinical contexts such as ECG-based cardiovascular disease (CVD) classification. This study investigates the comparative effectiveness of intermediate and late fusion strategies using ECG signals across three domains: time, frequency, and time-frequency. A series of experiments were conducted to identify the highest-performing fusion architecture. Results demonstrate that intermediate fusion consistently outperformed late fusion, achieving a peak accuracy of 97 percent, with Cohen's d > 0.8 relative to standalone models and d = 0.40 compared to late fusion. Interpretability analyses using saliency maps reveal that both models align with the discretized ECG signals. Statistical dependency between the discretized ECG signals and corresponding saliency maps for each class was confirmed using Mutual Information (MI). The proposed ECG domain-based multimodal model offers superior predictive capability and enhanced explainability, crucial attributes in medical AI applications, surpassing state-of-the-art models.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 102 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2025.

Builds on

15 of 102 references.

References · 15

  1. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
  2. 2017Multimodal Machine Learning: A Survey and Taxonomycited by 1,013
  3. 2019A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Towards Medical XAIcited by 404
  4. 2020Deep Learning for ECG Analysis: Benchmarks and Insights from PTB-XLcited by 158
  5. 2015A Review of Feature Selection Methods Based on Mutual Informationcited by 67
  6. 2017Cardiologist-Level Arrhythmia Detection with Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 53
  7. 2019Quantifying Interpretability and Trust in Machine Learning Systemscited by 49
  8. 2025Rethinking Multimodality: Optimizing Multimodal Deep Learning for Biomedical Signal Classificationcited by 7
  9. 2024MMLF: Multi-modal Multi-class Late Fusion for Object Detection with Uncertainty Estimationcited by 3
  10. 2021Robust heartbeat detection using multimodal recordings and ECG quality assessment with signal amplitudes dispersioncited by 2
  11. 2023MVMTnet: A Multi-variate Multi-modal Transformer for Multi-class Classification of Cardiac Irregularities Using ECG Waveforms and Clinical Notescited by 2
  12. 2018A Study of Deep Feature Fusion based Methods for Classifying Multi-lead ECGcited by 1
3 more
  1. 2021DeepMI: Deep Multi-lead ECG Fusion for Identifying Myocardial Infarction and its Occurrence-timecited by 1
  2. 2023Deep Learning Models for Arrhythmia Classification Using Stacked Time-frequency Scalogram Images from ECG Signalscited by 1
  3. 2025Arrhythmia Classification from 12-Lead ECG Signals Using Convolutional and Transformer-Based Deep Learning Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.

6 papers.