mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DiCriTest: Testing Scenario Generation for Decision-Making Agents Considering Diversity and Criticality

arXiv 2508.11514 ↗First posted 15 Aug 2025cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The growing deployment of decision-making agents in dynamic environments increases the demand for safety verification. While critical testing scenario generation has emerged as an appealing verification methodology, effectively balancing diversity and criticality remains a key challenge for existing methods, particularly due to local optima entrapment in high-dimensional scenario spaces. To address this limitation, we propose a dual-space guided testing framework that coordinates scenario parameter space and agent behavior space, aiming to generate testing scenarios considering diversity and criticality. Specifically, in the scenario parameter space, a hierarchical representation framework combines dimensionality reduction and multi-dimensional subspace evaluation to efficiently localize diverse and critical subspaces. This guides dynamic coordination between two generation modes: local perturbation and global exploration, optimizing critical scenario quantity and diversity. Complementarily, in the agent behavior space, agent-environment interaction data are leveraged to quantify behavioral criticality/diversity and adaptively support generation mode switching, forming a closed feedback loop that continuously enhances scenario characterization and exploration within the parameter space. Experiments show our framework improves critical scenario generation by an average of 56.23% and demonstrates greater diversity under novel parameter-behavior co-driven metrics when tested on five decision-making agents, outperforming state-of-the-art baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Aug 2025.

Builds on

20 of 47 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,449
  2. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,558
  3. 2017DeepXplore: Automated Whitebox Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 311
  4. 2017DeepTest: Automated Testing of Deep-Neural-Network-driven Autonomous Carscited by 251
  5. 2020Controlling Overestimation Bias with Truncated Mixture of Continuous Distributional Quantile Criticscited by 165
  6. 2018DeepGauge: Multi-Granularity Testing Criteria for Deep Learning Systemscited by 147
  7. 2022A Survey on Safety-Critical Driving Scenario Generation -- A Methodological Perspectivecited by 105
  8. 2022"Curse of rarity" for autonomous vehiclescited by 63
  9. 2018Scenarios for Development, Test and Validation of Automated Vehiclescited by 48
  10. 2023Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Connected and Automated Vehicles Control: Recent Advancements and Future Prospectscited by 18
  11. 2018Falsification of Cyber-Physical Systems Using Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 17
  12. 2024Deep Reinforcement Learning-based Large-scale Robot Explorationcited by 16
8 more
  1. 2021MDPFuzz: Testing Models Solving Markov Decision Processescited by 12
  2. 2023Sim-to-Real Surgical Robot Learning and Autonomous Planning for Internal Tissue Points Manipulation using Reinforcement Learningcited by 9
  3. 2025Enhancing Autonomous Driving Safety with Collision Scenario Integrationcited by 9
  4. 2021Part-X: A Family of Stochastic Algorithms for Search-Based Test Generation with Probabilistic Guaranteescited by 6
  5. 2018Fast Falsification of Hybrid Systems using Probabilistically Adaptive Inputcited by 4
  6. 2025Policy Testing with MDPFuzz (Replicability Study)cited by 4
  7. 2024Accurately Predicting Probabilities of Safety-Critical Rare Events for Intelligent Systemscited by 3
  8. 2024Testing for Fault Diversity in Reinforcement Learningcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.