A learning-driven automatic planning framework for proton PBS treatments of H&N cancers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) treatment planning for head & neck (H&N) cancers involves numerous conflicting objectives, requiring iterative objective parameter adjustments to balance multiple clinical goals. We propose a learning-driven inverse optimizer and integrate it into a proximal policy optimization (PPO)-based planning framework to automatically generate high-quality plans for patients with diverse treatment requirements. The inverse optimizer is a learning-to-optimize (L2O) method that predicts update steps by learning from task-specific data distributions. For the first time, long-context processing techniques developed for large language models (LLMs) are utilized to address the scalability limitations of existing L2O methods, enabling simultaneous optimization over a substantially large set of variables. The PPO framework functions as an outer-loop virtual planner, autonomously adjusting objective parameters through a policy network, and the inner-loop L2O inverse optimizer computes machine-deliverable spot monitor unit (MU) values based on the PPO-refined objectives. Moreover, a Swin UnetR dose predictor is trained with prescription- and beam-specific information to estimate the initial objective parameters. In our experiments, total 97 patients with bilateral or ipsilateral H&N cancers are collected for training and testing. Compared with the second-order gradient-based methods, our L2O optimizer improves the effectiveness and efficiency of the time-consuming inverse optimization by 22.97% and 36.41%, respectively, and in conjunction with the PPO-based virtual planner, plans are generated within clinically acceptable times, i.e. 2.55 hours in average, and shows improved or comparable organs-at-risk sparing with superior target coverage compared with human-generated plans.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2025.
Builds on
12 of 32 references.
References · 12
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2022FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awarenesscited by 3,673
- 2020Rethinking Attention with Performerscited by 1,601
- 2019Root Mean Square Layer Normalizationcited by 1,480
- 2023GQA: Training Generalized Multi-Query Transformer Models from Multi-Head Checkpointscited by 1,346
- 2021Self-Supervised Pre-Training of Swin Transformers for 3D Medical Image Analysiscited by 422
- 2023Effective Long-Context Scaling of Foundation Modelscited by 303
- 2021Learning to Optimize: A Primer and A Benchmarkcited by 208
- 2022Transformer-Based Learned Optimizationcited by 13
- 2023Mnemosyne: Learning to Train Transformers with Transformerscited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Automating proton PBS treatment planning for head and neck cancers using policy gradient-based deep reinforcement learning
- 2025Patient-Specific Deep Reinforcement Learning for Automatic Replanning in Head-and-Neck Cancer Proton Therapy
- 2025Large-scale automatic carbon ion treatment planning for head and neck cancers via parallel multi-agent reinforcement learning
- 2026Learning to Optimize Radiotherapy Plans via Fluence Maps Diffusion Model Generation and LSTM-based Optimization
- 2025Zero-Shot Large Language Model Agents for Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning
- 2025Autonomous Radiotherapy Treatment Planning Using DOLA: A Privacy-Preserving, LLM-Based Optimization Agent
- 2024Automated radiotherapy treatment planning guided by GPT-4Vision
- 2025Automated Treatment Planning for Interstitial HDR Brachytherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer using Deep Reinforcement Learning