mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Counterfactual Survival Q-learning via Buckley-James Boosting, with Applications to ACTG 175 and CALGB 8923

arXiv 2508.11060 ↗First posted 14 Aug 2025stat.ML cs.LG stat.MEcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a Buckley James (BJ) Boost Q learning framework for estimating optimal dynamic treatment regimes from right censored survival outcomes in longitudinal randomized clinical trials, motivated by the clinical need to support patient specific treatment decisions when follow up is incomplete and covariate effects may be nonlinear. The method combines accelerated failure time modeling with iterative boosting using flexible base learners, including componentwise least squares and regression trees, within a counterfactual Q learning framework. By modeling conditional survival time directly, BJ Boost Q learning avoids the proportional hazards assumption, yields clinically interpretable time scale contrasts, and enables estimation of stage specific Q functions and individualized decision rules under standard potential outcomes assumptions. In contrast to Cox based Q learning, which relies on hazard modeling and can be sensitive to nonproportional hazards and model misspecification, our approach provides a robust and flexible alternative for regime learning. Simulation studies and analyses of the ACTG175 HIV trial and the CALGB 8923 two stage leukemia trial show that BJ Boost Q learning improves treatment decision accuracy and produces more stable within participant counterfactual contrasts, particularly in multistage settings where estimation error and bias can compound across stages.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2025.

Builds on

2 of 25 references.

References · 2

  1. 2020Multi-stage optimal dynamic treatment regimes for survival outcomes with dependent censoringcited by 5
  2. 2025Counterfactual Q Learning via the Linear Buckley James Method for Longitudinal Survival Datacited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Near-Equivalent Q-learning Policies for Dynamic Treatment Regimes
  2. 2026Cost-optimal Sequential Testing via Doubly Robust Q-learning
  3. 2026Counterfactual Understanding via Retrieval-aware Multimodal Modeling for Time-to-Event Survival Prediction
  4. 2024Deep End-to-End Survival Analysis with Temporal Consistency
  5. 2025CleanSurvival: Automated data preprocessing for time-to-event models using reinforcement learning
  6. 2023Robust Fitted-Q-Evaluation and Iteration under Sequentially Exogenous Unobserved Confounders
  7. 2026Causal Diffusion Models for Counterfactual Outcome Distributions in Longitudinal Data
  8. 2025SurvDiff: A Diffusion Model for Generating Synthetic Data in Survival Analysis