mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Confounding is a Pervasive Problem in Real World Recommender Systems

arXiv 2508.10479 ↗First posted 14 Aug 2025cs.LG cs.IR stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Unobserved confounding arises when an unmeasured feature influences both the treatment and the outcome, leading to biased causal effect estimates. This issue undermines observational studies in fields like economics, medicine, ecology or epidemiology. Recommender systems leveraging fully observed data seem not to be vulnerable to this problem. However many standard practices in recommender systems result in observed features being ignored, resulting in effectively the same problem. This paper will show that numerous common practices such as feature engineering, A/B testing and modularization can in fact introduce confounding into recommendation systems and hamper their performance. Several illustrations of the phenomena are provided, supported by simulation studies with practical suggestions about how practitioners may reduce or avoid the affects of confounding in real systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2025.

Builds on

4 of 16 references.

References · 4

  1. 2022An Instrumental Variable Approach to Confounded Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 20
  2. 2021The Simpson's Paradox in the Offline Evaluation of Recommendation Systemscited by 16
  3. 2016Cost-sensitive Learning for Utility Optimization in Online Advertising Auctionscited by 7
  4. 2023Offline Recommender System Evaluation under Unobserved Confoundingcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.