mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Do Vision Transformers See Like Humans? Evaluating their Perceptual Alignment

arXiv 2508.09850 ↗First posted 13 Aug 2025cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Vision Transformers (ViTs) achieve remarkable performance in image recognition tasks, yet their alignment with human perception remains largely unexplored. This study systematically analyzes how model size, dataset size, data augmentation and regularization impact ViT perceptual alignment with human judgments on the TID2013 dataset. Our findings confirm that larger models exhibit lower perceptual alignment, consistent with previous works. Increasing dataset diversity has a minimal impact, but exposing models to the same images more times reduces alignment. Stronger data augmentation and regularization further decrease alignment, especially in models exposed to repeated training cycles. These results highlight a trade-off between model complexity, training strategies, and alignment with human perception, raising important considerations for applications requiring human-like visual understanding.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Aug 2025.

Builds on

6 of 10 references.

References · 6

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  2. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
  3. 2021Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 675
  4. 2021How to train your ViT? Data, Augmentation, and Regularization in Vision Transformerscited by 569
  5. 2022Do better ImageNet classifiers assess perceptual similarity better?cited by 34
  6. 2021Contrast Sensitivity Functions in Autoencoderscited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.