Adoption of Explainable Natural Language Processing: Perspectives from Industry and Academia on Practices and Challenges
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The field of explainable natural language processing (NLP) has grown rapidly in recent years. The growing opacity of complex models calls for transparency and explanations of their decisions, which is crucial to understand their reasoning and facilitate deployment, especially in high-stakes environments. Despite increasing attention given to explainable NLP, practitioners' perspectives regarding its practical adoption and effectiveness remain underexplored. This paper addresses this research gap by investigating practitioners' experiences with explainability methods, specifically focusing on their motivations for adopting such methods, the techniques employed, satisfaction levels, and the practical challenges encountered in real-world NLP applications. Through a qualitative interview-based study with industry practitioners and complementary interviews with academic researchers, we systematically analyze and compare their perspectives. Our findings reveal conceptual gaps, low satisfaction with current explainability methods, and highlight evaluation challenges. Our findings emphasize the need for clear definitions and user-centric frameworks for better adoption of explainable NLP in practice.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Aug 2025.
Builds on
14 of 39 references.
References · 14
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
- 2023Explainability for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 333
- 2022From Anecdotal Evidence to Quantitative Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review on Evaluating Explainable AIcited by 302
- 2021Teach Me to Explain: A Review of Datasets for Explainable Natural Language Processingcited by 126
- 2022On the Explainability of Natural Language Processing Deep Modelscited by 38
- 2025Show Me the Work: Fact-Checkers' Requirements for Explainable Automated Fact-Checkingcited by 29
- 2023Rationalization for Explainable NLP: A Surveycited by 22
- 2024Attention Mechanisms Don't Learn Additive Models: Rethinking Feature Importance for Transformerscited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.