mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Synaptic Pruning: A Biological Inspiration for Deep Learning Regularization

arXiv 2508.09330 ↗First posted 12 Aug 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Synaptic pruning in biological brains removes weak connections to improve efficiency. In contrast, dropout regularization in artificial neural networks randomly deactivates neurons without considering activity-dependent pruning. We propose a magnitude-based synaptic pruning method that better reflects biology by progressively removing low-importance connections during training. Integrated directly into the training loop as a dropout replacement, our approach computes weight importance from absolute magnitudes across layers and applies a cubic schedule to gradually increase global sparsity. At fixed intervals, pruning masks permanently remove low-importance weights while maintaining gradient flow for active ones, eliminating the need for separate pruning and fine-tuning phases. Experiments on multiple time series forecasting models including RNN, LSTM, and Patch Time Series Transformer across four datasets show consistent gains. Our method ranked best overall, with statistically significant improvements confirmed by Friedman tests (p < 0.01). In financial forecasting, it reduced Mean Absolute Error by up to 20% over models with no or standard dropout, and up to 52% in select transformer models. This dynamic pruning mechanism advances regularization by coupling weight elimination with progressive sparsification, offering easy integration into diverse architectures. Its strong performance, especially in financial time series forecasting, highlights its potential as a practical alternative to conventional dropout techniques.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2025.

Builds on

11 of 33 references.

References · 11

  1. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  2. 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,845
  3. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
  4. 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 2,031
  5. 2016Pruning Filters for Efficient ConvNetscited by 1,143
  6. 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,060
  7. 2018SNIP: Single-shot Network Pruning based on Connection Sensitivitycited by 812
  8. 2017To prune, or not to prune: exploring the efficacy of pruning for model compressioncited by 603
  9. 2015Variational Dropout and the Local Reparameterization Trickcited by 490
  10. 2020Picking Winning Tickets Before Training by Preserving Gradient Flowcited by 471
  11. 2017Concrete Dropoutcited by 227

Built on by

Not cited yet.