Jointly Generating and Attributing Answers using Logits of Document-Identifier Tokens
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite their impressive performances, Large Language Models (LLMs) remain prone to hallucination, which critically undermines their trustworthiness. While most of the previous work focused on tackling answer and attribution correctness, a recent line of work investigated faithfulness, with a focus on leveraging internal model signals to reflect a model's actual decision-making process while generating the answer. Nevertheless, these methods induce additional latency and have shown limitations in directly aligning token generation with attribution generation. In this paper, we introduce LoDIT, a method that jointly generates and faithfully attributes answers in RAG by leveraging specific token logits during generation. It consists of two steps: (1) marking the documents with specific token identifiers and then leveraging the logits of these tokens to estimate the contribution of each document to the answer during generation, and (2) aggregating these contributions into document attributions. Experiments on a trustworthiness-focused attributed text-generation benchmark, Trust-Align, show that LoDIT significantly outperforms state-of-the-art models on several metrics. Finally, an in-depth analysis of LoDIT shows both its efficiency in terms of latency and its robustness in different settings.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2025.
Builds on
39 of 50 references.
References · 39
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
- 2022Atlas: Few-shot Learning with Retrieval Augmented Language Modelscited by 952
- 2023In-Context Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 702
- 2021Retrieval Augmentation Reduces Hallucination in Conversationcited by 692
- 2023Enabling Large Language Models to Generate Text with Citationscited by 595
- 2019ELI5: Long Form Question Answeringcited by 575
- 2023Large Language Models Are Not Robust Multiple Choice Selectorscited by 486
- 2023Evaluating Verifiability in Generative Search Enginescited by 303
- 2022Teaching language models to support answers with verified quotescited by 292
27 more
- 2022RARR: Researching and Revising What Language Models Say, Using Language Modelscited by 287
- 2022ASQA: Factoid Questions Meet Long-Form Answerscited by 234
- 2024Hallucination-Free? Assessing the Reliability of Leading AI Legal Research Toolscited by 176
- 2021Hurdles to Progress in Long-form Question Answeringcited by 167
- 2014A Convolutional Neural Network for Modelling Sentencescited by 163
- 2021Comparing Kullback-Leibler Divergence and Mean Squared Error Loss in Knowledge Distillationcited by 134
- 2024Bias and Unfairness in Information Retrieval Systems: New Challenges in the LLM Eracited by 98
- 2023ExpertQA: Expert-Curated Questions and Attributed Answerscited by 97
- 2024Reducing hallucination in structured outputs via Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 93
- 2023Search-in-the-Chain: Interactively Enhancing Large Language Models with Search for Knowledge-intensive Taskscited by 73
- 2024A Peek into Token Bias: Large Language Models Are Not Yet Genuine Reasonerscited by 73
- 2023Automatic Evaluation of Attribution by Large Language Modelscited by 72
- 2023HAGRID: A Human-LLM Collaborative Dataset for Generative Information-Seeking with Attributioncited by 56
- 2023A Setwise Approach for Effective and Highly Efficient Zero-shot Ranking with Large Language Modelscited by 55
- 2024Attribute First, then Generate: Locally-attributable Grounded Text Generationcited by 54
- 2018Baseline Needs More Love: On Simple Word-Embedding-Based Models and Associated Pooling Mechanismscited by 53
- 2022QAMPARI: An Open-domain Question Answering Benchmark for Questions with Many Answers from Multiple Paragraphscited by 42
- 2024Measuring and Enhancing Trustworthiness of LLMs in RAG through Grounded Attributions and Learning to Refusecited by 34
- 2024Peering into the Mind of Language Models: An Approach for Attribution in Contextual Question Answeringcited by 25
- 2024Model Internals-based Answer Attribution for Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 25
- 2024Ground Every Sentence: Improving Retrieval-Augmented LLMs with Interleaved Reference-Claim Generationcited by 21
- 2024Correctness is not Faithfulness in RAG Attributionscited by 18
- 2024Advancing Large Language Model Attribution through Self-Improvingcited by 14
- 2023ChatGPT is Good but Bing Chat is Better for Vietnamese Studentscited by 5
- 2024Post-Hoc Answer Attribution for Grounded and Trustworthy Long Document Comprehension: Task, Insights, and Challengescited by 5
- 2024Attention with Dependency Parsing Augmentation for Fine-Grained Attributioncited by 5
- 2024An Evaluation Framework for Attributed Information Retrieval using Large Language Modelscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Evaluation of Attribution Bias in Generator-Aware Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models
- 2025SAFE: Improving LLM Systems using Sentence-Level In-generation Attribution
- 2026How Do LLMs Cite? A Mechanistic Interpretation of Attribution in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- 2025Source Attribution in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- 2024Trustworthiness in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems: A Survey
- 2024Semantic Tokens in Retrieval Augmented Generation
- 2025After Retrieval, Before Generation: Enhancing the Trustworthiness of Large Language Models in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- 2025VeriCite: Towards Reliable Citations in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Rigorous Verification