mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ProteoKnight: Convolution-based Phage Virion Protein Classification and Uncertainty Analysis

arXiv 2508.07345 ↗First posted 10 Aug 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Introduction: Accurate prediction of Phage Virion Proteins (PVP) is essential for genomic studies due to their crucial role as structural elements in bacteriophages. Computational tools, particularly machine learning, have emerged for annotating phage protein sequences from high-throughput sequencing. However, effective annotation requires specialized sequence encodings. Our paper introduces ProteoKnight, a new image-based encoding method that addresses spatial constraints in existing techniques, yielding competitive performance in PVP classification using pre-trained convolutional neural networks. Additionally, our study evaluates prediction uncertainty in binary PVP classification through Monte Carlo Dropout (MCD). Methods: ProteoKnight adapts the classical DNA-Walk algorithm for protein sequences, incorporating pixel colors and adjusting walk distances to capture intricate protein features. Encoded sequences were classified using multiple pre-trained CNNs. Variance and entropy measures assessed prediction uncertainty across proteins of various classes and lengths. Results: Our experiments achieved 90.8% accuracy in binary classification, comparable to state-of-the-art methods. Multi-class classification accuracy remains suboptimal. Our uncertainty analysis unveils variability in prediction confidence influenced by protein class and sequence length. Conclusions: Our study surpasses frequency chaos game representation (FCGR) by introducing novel image encoding that mitigates spatial information loss limitations. Our classification technique yields accurate and robust PVP predictions while identifying low-confidence predictions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2025.

Builds on

8 of 68 references.

References · 8

  1. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  2. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  3. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
  4. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,160
  5. 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 913
  6. 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 819
  7. 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 565
  8. 2020Estimating Uncertainty and Interpretability in Deep Learning for Coronavirus (COVID-19) Detectioncited by 46

Built on by

Not cited yet.