mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Propagation Tree Is Not Deep: Adaptive Graph Contrastive Learning Approach for Rumor Detection

arXiv 2508.07201 ↗First posted 10 Aug 2025cs.SI cs.AI cs.CLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Rumor detection on social media has become increasingly important. Most existing graph-based models presume rumor propagation trees (RPTs) have deep structures and learn sequential stance features along branches. However, through statistical analysis on real-world datasets, we find RPTs exhibit wide structures, with most nodes being shallow 1-level replies. To focus learning on intensive substructures, we propose Rumor Adaptive Graph Contrastive Learning (RAGCL) method with adaptive view augmentation guided by node centralities. We summarize three principles for RPT augmentation: 1) exempt root nodes, 2) retain deep reply nodes, 3) preserve lower-level nodes in deep sections. We employ node dropping, attribute masking and edge dropping with probabilities from centrality-based importance scores to generate views. A graph contrastive objective then learns robust rumor representations. Extensive experiments on four benchmark datasets demonstrate RAGCL outperforms state-of-the-art methods. Our work reveals the wide-structure nature of RPTs and contributes an effective graph contrastive learning approach tailored for rumor detection through principled adaptive augmentation. The proposed principles and augmentation techniques can potentially benefit other applications involving tree-structured graphs.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2025.

Builds on

23 of 49 references.

References · 23

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  4. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  5. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  6. 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,487
  7. 2020Graph Contrastive Learning with Augmentationscited by 1,208
  8. 2018Deep Graph Infomaxcited by 1,106
  9. 2018Deeper Insights into Graph Convolutional Networks for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,102
  10. 2020Contrastive Multi-View Representation Learning on Graphscited by 652
  11. 2020Graph Contrastive Learning with Adaptive Augmentationcited by 519
  12. 2018Neural Relational Inference for Interacting Systemscited by 339
11 more
  1. 2021Graph Contrastive Learning Automatedcited by 287
  2. 2020DeCLUTR: Deep Contrastive Learning for Unsupervised Textual Representationscited by 251
  3. 2020A Note on Over-Smoothing for Graph Neural Networkscited by 249
  4. 2023Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part I: PPOcited by 229
  5. 2020CERT: Contrastive Self-supervised Learning for Language Understandingcited by 169
  6. 2020Rumor Detection on Social Media with Bi-Directional Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 153
  7. 2021AutoGCL: Automated Graph Contrastive Learning via Learnable View Generatorscited by 73
  8. 2020Interpretable Rumor Detection in Microblogs by Attending to User Interactionscited by 44
  9. 2021Towards Propagation Uncertainty: Edge-enhanced Bayesian Graph Convolutional Networks for Rumor Detectioncited by 34
  10. 2018DeepChannel: Salience Estimation by Contrastive Learning for Extractive Document Summarizationcited by 6
  11. 2025Graph Representation Learning with Massive Unlabeled Data for Rumor Detectioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

7 papers.