mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Improved Personalized Headline Generation via Denoising Fake Interests from Implicit Feedback

arXiv 2508.07178 ↗First posted 10 Aug 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate personalized headline generation hinges on precisely capturing user interests from historical behaviors. However, existing methods neglect personalized-irrelevant click noise in entire historical clickstreams, which may lead to hallucinated headlines that deviate from genuine user preferences. In this paper, we reveal the detrimental impact of click noise on personalized generation quality through rigorous analysis in both user and news dimensions. Based on these insights, we propose a novel Personalized Headline Generation framework via Denoising Fake Interests from Implicit Feedback (PHG-DIF). PHG-DIF first employs dual-stage filtering to effectively remove clickstream noise, identified by short dwell times and abnormal click bursts, and then leverages multi-level temporal fusion to dynamically model users' evolving and multi-faceted interests for precise profiling. Moreover, we release DT-PENS, a new benchmark dataset comprising the click behavior of 1,000 carefully curated users and nearly 10,000 annotated personalized headlines with historical dwell time annotations. Extensive experiments demonstrate that PHG-DIF substantially mitigates the adverse effects of click noise and significantly improves headline quality, achieving state-of-the-art (SOTA) results on DT-PENS. Our framework implementation and dataset are available at https://github.com/liukejin-up/PHG-DIF.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2025.

Builds on

21 of 34 references.

References · 21

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  4. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  5. 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,292
  6. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,203
  7. 2024ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Toolscited by 1,121
  8. 2016Abstractive Text Summarization Using Sequence-to-Sequence RNNs and Beyondcited by 812
  9. 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 722
  10. 2017Deep Interest Network for Click-Through Rate Predictioncited by 544
  11. 2024LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methodscited by 465
  12. 2023LaMP: When Large Language Models Meet Personalizationcited by 437
9 more
  1. 2015A Neural Attention Model for Abstractive Sentence Summarizationcited by 396
  2. 2018Deep Interest Evolution Network for Click-Through Rate Predictioncited by 338
  3. 2024Can LLM be a Personalized Judge?cited by 100
  4. 2020Denoising Implicit Feedback for Recommendationcited by 80
  5. 2021HieRec: Hierarchical User Interest Modeling for Personalized News Recommendationcited by 31
  6. 2022Reweighting Clicks with Dwell Time in Recommendationcited by 6
  7. 2025Panoramic Interests: Stylistic-Content Aware Personalized Headline Generationcited by 4
  8. 2025Fact-Preserved Personalized News Headline Generationcited by 2
  9. 2024Time Matters: Enhancing Pre-trained News Recommendation Models with Robust User Dwell Time Injectioncited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.