mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Compressibility Barriers to Neighborhood-Preserving Data Visualizations

arXiv 2508.07119 ↗First posted 9 Aug 2025cs.CG math.MGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

To what extent is it possible to visualize high-dimensional data in two- or three-dimensional plots? We reframe this question in terms of embedding n-vertex graphs (representing the neighborhood structure of the input points) into metric spaces of low doubling dimension d in such a way that keeps neighbors close and non-neighbors far. This notion of neighbor preservation can be understood as a considerably weaker embedding constraint than near-isometry, yet it is similarly as demanding in terms of how the minimum required dimension scales with the number of points. We show that for an overwhelming fraction of graphs, d = Theta(log n) is both necessary and sufficient for neighbor preservation. Even sparse regular graphs, which represent more restricted neighborhood connectivity structures, typically require d= Omega(log n / loglog n). The landscape changes dramatically when embedding into normed spaces: general graphs become exponentially harder to embed, requiring d=Omega(n), while sparse regular graphs continue to admit d = O(log n). Finally, we study the implications of these results for visualizing data with intrinsic cluster structure. We show that graphs produced from a planted partition model with k clusters on n points typically require d=Omega(log n), even when the cluster structure is salient. These results challenge the aspiration that constant-dimensional visualizations can faithfully preserve neighborhood structure.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Aug 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.

3 papers.