Label Inference Attacks against Federated Unlearning
On the map: LLM safety and security → Federated unlearning and poisoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated Unlearning (FU) has emerged as a promising solution to respond to the right to be forgotten of clients, by allowing clients to erase their data from global models without compromising model performance. Unfortunately, researchers find that the parameter variations of models induced by FU expose clients' data information, enabling attackers to infer the label of unlearning data, while label inference attacks against FU remain unexplored. In this paper, we introduce and analyze a new privacy threat against FU and propose a novel label inference attack, ULIA, which can infer unlearning data labels across three FU levels. To address the unique challenges of inferring labels via the models variations, we design a gradient-label mapping mechanism in ULIA that establishes a relationship between gradient variations and unlearning labels, enabling inferring labels on accumulated model variations. We evaluate ULIA on both IID and non-IID settings. Experimental results show that in the IID setting, ULIA achieves a 100% Attack Success Rate (ASR) under both class-level and client-level unlearning. Even when only 1% of a user's local data is forgotten, ULIA still attains an ASR ranging from 93% to 62.3%.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Federated unlearning and poisoning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 12 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Aug 2025.
Builds on
12 of 31 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Efficient Federated Unlearning with Adaptive Differential Privacy Preservation17 Nov
- 2023A Survey on Federated Unlearning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directions31 Oct
- 2022The Right to be Forgotten in Federated Learning: An Efficient Realization with Rapid Retraining14 Mar
- 2021Federated Unlearning via Class-Discriminative Pruning22 Oct
Other references · 8
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2019Distance-IoU Loss: Faster and Better Learning for Bounding Box Regressioncited by 459
- 2020iDLG: Improved Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 382
- 2018Acquisition of Localization Confidence for Accurate Object Detectioncited by 176
- 2021Federated Learning for Open Bankingcited by 141
- 2021Label Leakage and Protection in Two-party Split Learningcited by 90
- 2023Exploring the Landscape of Machine Unlearning: A Comprehensive Survey and Taxonomycited by 51
- 2022Federated Unlearning for On-Device Recommendationcited by 43
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025FedMUA: Exploring the Vulnerabilities of Federated Learning to Malicious Unlearning Attacks
- 2025Apollo: A Posteriori Label-Only Membership Inference Attack Towards Machine Unlearning
- 2025Model Inversion Attack against Federated Unlearning
- 2026Revisiting Privacy Leakage in Machine Unlearning: Membership Inference Beyond the Forgotten Set
- 2024KDk: A Defense Mechanism Against Label Inference Attacks in Vertical Federated Learning
- 2025NoT: Federated Unlearning via Weight Negation
- 2025Recalling The Forgotten Class Memberships: Unlearned Models Can Be Noisy Labelers to Leak Privacy
- 2024Streamlined Federated Unlearning: Unite as One to Be Highly Efficient