mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Enhancing the Scalability of Classical Surrogates for Real-World Quantum Machine Learning Applications

arXiv 2508.06131 ↗First posted 8 Aug 2025quant-ph cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Quantum machine learning (QML) presents potential for early industrial adoption, yet limited access to quantum hardware remains a significant bottleneck for deployment of QML solutions. This work explores the use of classical surrogates to bypass this restriction, which is a technique that allows to build a lightweight classical representation of a (trained) quantum model, enabling to perform inference on entirely classical devices. We reveal prohibiting high computational demand associated with previously proposed methods for generating classical surrogates from quantum models, and propose an alternative pipeline enabling generation of classical surrogates at a larger scale than was previously possible. Previous methods required at least a high-performance computing (HPC) system for quantum models of below industrial scale (ca. 20 qubits), which raises questions about its practicality. We greatly minimize the redundancies of the previous approach, utilizing only a minute fraction of the resources previously needed. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on a real-world energy demand forecasting problem, conducting rigorous testing of performance and computation demand in both simulations and on quantum hardware. Our results indicate that our method achieves high accuracy on the testing dataset while its computational resource requirements scale linearly rather than exponentially. This work presents a lightweight approach to transform quantum solutions into classically deployable versions, facilitating faster integration of quantum technology in industrial settings. Furthermore, it can serve as a powerful research tool in search practical quantum advantage in an empirical setup.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2025.

Builds on

17 of 39 references.

References · 17

  1. 2020The power of quantum neural networkscited by 379
  2. 2020The effect of data encoding on the expressive power of variational quantum machine learning modelscited by 333
  3. 2020A rigorous and robust quantum speed-up in supervised machine learningcited by 271
  4. 2020Noise-Induced Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 193
  5. 2021Quantum machine learning beyond kernel methodscited by 92
  6. 2015On the Error of Random Fourier Featurescited by 76
  7. 2022Classical surrogates for quantum learning modelscited by 39
  8. 2021Subtleties in the trainability of quantum machine learning modelscited by 33
  9. 2023Shadows of quantum machine learningcited by 31
  10. 2024On the relation between trainability and dequantization of variational quantum learning modelscited by 25
  11. 2023Potential and limitations of random Fourier features for dequantizing quantum machine learningcited by 22
  12. 2021Consistency Regularization Can Improve Robustness to Label Noisecited by 18
5 more
  1. 2018Principal Component Analysis: A Natural Approach to Data Explorationcited by 9
  2. 2024Mitigating exponential concentration in covariant quantum kernels for subspace and real-world datacited by 8
  3. 2021Generative Adversarial Networks for Synthetic Data Generation: A Comparative Studycited by 5
  4. 2024Building Continuous Quantum-Classical Bayesian Neural Networks for a Classical Clinical Datasetcited by 4
  5. 2022Quantum-Aided Meta-Learning for Bayesian Binary Neural Networks via Born Machinescited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.