Bionic Vision as Neuroadaptive XR: Closed-Loop Perceptual Interfaces for Neurotechnology
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Visual neuroprostheses are commonly framed as technologies to restore natural sight to people who are blind. In practice, they create a novel mode of perception shaped by sparse, distorted, and unstable input. They resemble early extended reality (XR) headsets more than natural vision, streaming video from a head-mounted camera to a neural "display" with under 1000 pixels, limited field of view, low refresh rates, and nonlinear spatial mappings. No amount of resolution alone will make this experience natural. This paper proposes a reframing: bionic vision as neuroadaptive XR. Rather than replicating natural sight, the goal is to co-adapt brain and device through a bidirectional interface that responds to neural constraints, behavioral goals, and cognitive state. By comparing traditional XR, current implants, and proposed neuroadaptive systems, it introduces a new design space for inclusive, brain-aware computing. It concludes with research provocations spanning encoding, evaluation, learning, and ethics, and invites the XR community to help shape the future of sensory augmentation.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2025.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.