mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Federated Multi-Objective Learning with Controlled Pareto Frontiers

arXiv 2508.05424 ↗First posted 7 Aug 2025cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning (FL) is a widely adopted paradigm for privacy-preserving model training, but FedAvg optimise for the majority while under-serving minority clients. Existing methods such as federated multi-objective learning (FMOL) attempts to import multi-objective optimisation (MOO) into FL. However, it merely delivers task-wise Pareto-stationary points, leaving client fairness to chance. In this paper, we introduce Conically-Regularised FMOL (CR-FMOL), the first federated MOO framework that enforces client-wise Pareto optimality through a novel preference-cone constraint. After local federated multi-gradient descent averaging (FMGDA) / federated stochastic multi-gradient descent averaging (FSMGDA) steps, each client transmits its aggregated task-loss vector as an implicit preference; the server then solves a cone-constrained Pareto-MTL sub-problem centred at the uniform vector, producing a descent direction that is Pareto-stationary for every client within its cone. Experiments on non-IID benchmarks show that CR-FMOL enhances client fairness, and although the early-stage performance is slightly inferior to FedAvg, it is expected to achieve comparable accuracy given sufficient training rounds.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2025.

Builds on

5 of 11 references.

References · 5

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2018Multi-Task Learning as Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 821
  3. 2019Pareto Multi-Task Learningcited by 224
  4. 2020Federated Learning Meets Multi-objective Optimizationcited by 53
  5. 2023Federated Multi-Objective Learningcited by 12

Built on by

Not cited yet.