Near Optimal Inference for the Best-Performing Algorithm
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Consider a collection of competing machine learning algorithms. Given their performance on a benchmark of datasets, we would like to identify the best performing algorithm. Specifically, which algorithm is most likely to rank highest on a future, unseen dataset. A natural approach is to select the algorithm that demonstrates the best performance on the benchmark. However, in many cases the performance differences are marginal and additional candidates may also be considered. This problem is formulated as subset selection for multinomial distributions. Formally, given a sample from a countable alphabet, our goal is to identify a minimal subset of symbols that includes the most frequent symbol in the population with high confidence. In this work, we introduce a novel framework for the subset selection problem. We provide both asymptotic and finite-sample schemes that significantly improve upon currently known methods. In addition, we provide matching lower bounds, demonstrating the favorable performance of our proposed schemes.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2025.
Builds on
4 of 35 references.
References · 4
- 2023When Do Neural Nets Outperform Boosted Trees on Tabular Data?cited by 223
- 2024A Comprehensive Benchmark of Machine and Deep Learning Across Diverse Tabular Datasetscited by 15
- 2016Rank Verification for Exponential Familiescited by 13
- 2024Distribution Estimation under the Infinity Normcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.