Toward Errorless Training ImageNet-1k
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we describe a feedforward artificial neural network trained on the ImageNet 2012 contest dataset [7] with the new method of [5] to an accuracy rate of 98.3% with a 99.69 Top-1 rate, and an average of 285.9 labels that are perfectly classified over the 10 batch partitions of the dataset. The best performing model uses 322,430,160 parameters, with 4 decimal places precision. We conjecture that the reason our model does not achieve a 100% accuracy rate is due to a double-labeling problem, by which there are duplicate images in the dataset with different labels.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2025.
Builds on
5 of 21 references.
References · 5
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,509
- 2021MedMNIST v2 -- A large-scale lightweight benchmark for 2D and 3D biomedical image classificationcited by 690
- 2014One weird trick for parallelizing convolutional neural networkscited by 264
- 2023Error-free Training for Artificial Neural Networkcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Benchmarking PNW Model for MedMNIST to 100% Accuracycited by 0
- 2026Benchmarking PNW Model for MedMNIST to 100% Accuracy20 Apr 2026