mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Toward Errorless Training ImageNet-1k

arXiv 2508.04941 ↗First posted 6 Aug 2025cs.CV cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we describe a feedforward artificial neural network trained on the ImageNet 2012 contest dataset [7] with the new method of [5] to an accuracy rate of 98.3% with a 99.69 Top-1 rate, and an average of 285.9 labels that are perfectly classified over the 10 batch partitions of the dataset. The best performing model uses 322,430,160 parameters, with 4 decimal places precision. We conjecture that the reason our model does not achieve a 100% accuracy rate is due to a double-labeling problem, by which there are duplicate images in the dataset with different labels.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2025.

Builds on

5 of 21 references.

References · 5

  1. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  2. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,509
  3. 2021MedMNIST v2 -- A large-scale lightweight benchmark for 2D and 3D biomedical image classificationcited by 690
  4. 2014One weird trick for parallelizing convolutional neural networkscited by 264
  5. 2023Error-free Training for Artificial Neural Networkcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.