Artificial Consciousness as Interface Representation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Whether artificial intelligence (AI) systems can possess consciousness is a contentious question because of the inherent challenges of defining and operationalizing subjective experience. This paper proposes a framework to reframe the question of artificial consciousness into empirically tractable tests. We introduce three evaluative criteria - S (subjective-linguistic), L (latent-emergent), and P (phenomenological-structural) - collectively termed SLP-tests, which assess whether an AI system instantiates interface representations that facilitate consciousness-like properties. Drawing on category theory, we model interface representations as mappings between relational substrates (RS) and observable behaviors, akin to specific types of abstraction layers. The SLP-tests collectively operationalize subjective experience not as an intrinsic property of physical systems but as a functional interface to a relational entity.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2025.
Builds on
6 of 36 references.
References · 6
- 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,736
- 2021Technological Approach to Mind Everywhere (TAME): an experimentally-grounded framework for understanding diverse bodies and mindscited by 25
- 2022Integrated information theory (IIT) 4.0: Formulating the properties of phenomenal existence in physical termscited by 21
- 2023Emergent Causality and the Foundation of Consciousnesscited by 9
- 2023Computational Dualism and Objective Superintelligencecited by 8
- 2023Classical Sorting Algorithms as a Model of Morphogenesis: self-sorting arrays reveal unexpected competencies in a minimal model of basal intelligencecited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Categorical AI phenomenology: A first-person approachcited by 0
- 2026Categorical AI phenomenology: A first-person approach19 Aug 2026