Identity Theft in AI Conference Peer Review
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We discuss newly uncovered cases of identity theft in the scientific peer-review process within artificial intelligence (AI) research, with broader implications for other academic procedures. We detail how dishonest researchers exploit the peer-review system by creating fraudulent reviewer profiles to manipulate paper evaluations, leveraging weaknesses in reviewer recruitment workflows and identity verification processes. The findings highlight the critical need for stronger safeguards against identity theft in peer review and academia at large, and to this end, we also propose mitigating strategies.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 9 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2025.
Builds on
3 of 9 references.
References · 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2026Position: Academic Conferences are Potentially Facing Denominator Gaming Caused by Fully Automated Scientific Agentscited by 1
- 2025Who is a Better Matchmaker? Human vs. Algorithmic Judge Assignment in a High-Stakes Startup Competitioncited by 0
- 2026Smooth Partial Lotteries for Stable Randomized Selectioncited by 0
- 2026Smooth Partial Lotteries for Stable Randomized Selection19 May 2026
- 2026Position: Academic Conferences are Potentially Facing Denominator Gaming Caused by Fully Automated Scientific Agents11 May 2026
- 2025Who is a Better Matchmaker? Human vs. Algorithmic Judge Assignment in a High-Stakes Startup Competition14 Oct 2025