mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Quality Versus Sparsity in Image Recovery by Dictionary Learning Using Iterative Shrinkage

arXiv 2508.03492 ↗First posted 5 Aug 2025cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sparse dictionary learning (SDL) is a fundamental technique that is useful for many image processing tasks. As an example we consider here image recovery, where SDL can be cast as a nonsmooth optimization problem. For this kind of problems, iterative shrinkage methods represent a powerful class of algorithms that are subject of ongoing research. Sparsity is an important property of the learned solutions, as exactly the sparsity enables efficient further processing or storage. The sparsity implies that a recovered image is determined as a combination of a number of dictionary elements that is as low as possible. Therefore, the question arises, to which degree sparsity should be enforced in SDL in order to not compromise recovery quality. In this paper we focus on the sparsity of solutions that can be obtained using a variety of optimization methods. It turns out that there are different sparsity regimes depending on the method in use. Furthermore, we illustrate that high sparsity does in general not compromise recovery quality, even if the recovered image is quite different from the learning database.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2025.

Builds on

3 of 23 references.

References · 3

  1. 2013Sparsity Based Poisson Denoising with Dictionary Learningcited by 9
  2. 2025Sparse Dictionary Learning for Image Recovery by Iterative Shrinkagecited by 1
  3. 2025Semi-Monotone Goldstein Line Search Strategy with Application in Sparse Recoverycited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.