mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MedCAL-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark on Cold-Start Active Learning with Foundation Models for Medical Image Analysis

arXiv 2508.03441 ↗First posted 5 Aug 2025cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Cold-Start Active Learning (CSAL) aims to select informative samples for annotation without prior knowledge, which is important for improving annotation efficiency and model performance under a limited annotation budget in medical image analysis. Most existing CSAL methods rely on Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) on the target dataset for feature extraction, which is inefficient and limited by insufficient feature representation. Recently, pre-trained Foundation Models (FMs) have shown powerful feature extraction ability with a potential for better CSAL. However, this paradigm has been rarely investigated, with a lack of benchmarks for comparison of FMs in CSAL tasks. To this end, we propose MedCAL-Bench, the first systematic FM-based CSAL benchmark for medical image analysis. We evaluate 14 FMs and 7 CSAL strategies across 7 datasets under different annotation budgets, covering classification and segmentation tasks from diverse medical modalities. It is also the first CSAL benchmark that evaluates both the feature extraction and sample selection stages. Our experimental results reveal that: 1) Most FMs are effective feature extractors for CSAL, with DINO family performing the best in segmentation; 2) The performance differences of these FMs are large in segmentation tasks, while small for classification; 3) Different sample selection strategies should be considered in CSAL on different datasets, with Active Learning by Processing Surprisal (ALPS) performing the best in segmentation while RepDiv leading for classification. The code is available at https://github.com/HiLab-git/MedCAL-Bench.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2025.

Builds on

19 of 38 references.

References · 19

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  4. 2022DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 1,319
  5. 2021MedMNIST v2 -- A large-scale lightweight benchmark for 2D and 3D biomedical image classificationcited by 690
  6. 2019A large annotated medical image dataset for the development and evaluation of segmentation algorithmscited by 373
  7. 2017Suggestive Annotation: A Deep Active Learning Framework for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 146
  8. 2022Active Learning on a Budget: Opposite Strategies Suit High and Low Budgetscited by 133
  9. 2020Cold-start Active Learning through Self-supervised Language Modelingcited by 128
  10. 2022Active Learning Through a Covering Lenscited by 66
  11. 2022A Framework and Benchmark for Deep Batch Active Learning for Regressioncited by 49
  12. 2021Diminishing Uncertainty within the Training Pool: Active Learning for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 45
7 more
  1. 2024Decomposing Disease Descriptions for Enhanced Pathology Detection: A Multi-Aspect Vision-Language Pre-training Frameworkcited by 27
  2. 2022Making Your First Choice: To Address Cold Start Problem in Vision Active Learningcited by 25
  3. 2024A Cross-Domain Benchmark for Active Learningcited by 12
  4. 2023BaSAL: Size-Balanced Warm Start Active Learning for LiDAR Semantic Segmentationcited by 8
  5. 2023Data efficient deep learning for medical image analysis: A surveycited by 6
  6. 2024Bridging Diversity and Uncertainty in Active learning with Self-Supervised Pre-Trainingcited by 6
  7. 2024An Uncertainty-guided Tiered Self-training Framework for Active Source-free Domain Adaptation in Prostate Segmentationcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.