CTTS: Collective Test-Time Scaling
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
Test-time scaling (TTS) has emerged as a promising, training-free approach for enhancing large language model (LLM) performance. However, the efficacy of existing methods, such as Best-of-N and Self-Consistency, is fundamentally constrained by the dominant single test-time scaling (STTS) paradigm, which relies on a single LLM agent interacting with a single reward model (SA-SR). Inspired by recent work showing that collective methods can surpass the performance ceiling of individual models, we introduce Collective Test-Time Scaling (CTTS). First, we systematically investigate three primary interaction paradigms of existing multiple models: single-agent-multi-reward (SA-MR), multi-agent-single-reward (MA-SR), and multi-agent-multi-reward (MA-MR). Extensive experiments reveal that the MA-MR paradigm is consistently superior. Based on this finding, we further propose CTTS-MM, a novel framework that operationalizes multi-agent and multi-reward collaboration. CTTS-MM integrates two key technical contributions: (1) for agent collaboration, an Agent Collaboration Search (ACS) that identifies the most effective combination of LLMs from a candidate pool; and (2) for reward model collaboration, a Mixture of Reward Models (MoR) strategy that leverages a Prior Reward model Ensemble Selection (PRES) algorithm to select the optimal ensemble. Evaluations across seven mainstream benchmarks demonstrate that CTTS-MM significantly outperforms leading STTS methods (+4.82% over Best-of-N) and surpasses even flagship proprietary LLMs (+7.06% over GPT-4.1) and open-source LLMs. These results highlight the substantial potential of collective scaling to push the frontier of LLM inference. Code will be released at https://github.com/magent4aci/CTTS-MM.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 42 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2025.
Builds on
42 of 56 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Llama-Nemotron: Efficient Reasoning Models2 May
- 2025EXAONE Deep: Reasoning Enhanced Language Models16 Mar
- 2025Skill-Based Mixture-of-Experts: Adaptive Routing for Heterogeneous Reasoning via Inferred Skills7 Mar
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models17 May
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback30 Mar
Other references · 37
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
25 more
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
- 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 1,906
- 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
- 2024Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Reportcited by 1,151
- 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,143
- 2024ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Toolscited by 1,096
- 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,057
- 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 946
- 2023FrugalGPT: How to Use Large Language Models While Reducing Cost and Improving Performancecited by 791
- 2023YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Modelscited by 584
- 2024Mixture-of-Agents Enhances Large Language Model Capabilitiescited by 420
- 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 402
- 2024Skywork-Reward: Bag of Tricks for Reward Modeling in LLMscited by 322
- 2023Benchmarking Large Language Models in Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 307
- 2025Skywork-Reward-V2: Scaling Preference Data Curation via Human-AI Synergycited by 204
- 2024More Agents Is All You Needcited by 174
- 2023Large Language Model Routing with Benchmark Datasetscited by 166
- 2023Routing to the Expert: Efficient Reward-guided Ensemble of Large Language Modelscited by 141
- 2024HelpSteer2-Preference: Complementing Ratings with Preferencescited by 129
- 2024BoNBoN Alignment for Large Language Models and the Sweetness of Best-of-n Samplingcited by 120
- 2025ACECODER: Acing Coder RL via Automated Test-Case Synthesiscited by 89
- 2024Quantile Regression for Distributional Reward Models in RLHFcited by 59
- 2024Harnessing the Power of Multiple Minds: Lessons Learned from LLM Routingcited by 43
- 2025The Avengers: A Simple Recipe for Uniting Smaller Language Models to Challenge Proprietary Giantscited by 37
- 2025DeRS: Towards Extremely Efficient Upcycled Mixture-of-Experts Modelscited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2025Input-Time Scaling: Adding Noise and Irrelevance into Less-Is-More Drastically Improves Reasoning Performance and Efficiencycited by 0
- 2026Test-Time Scaling in the Wild: Why Exploitation, Not Exploration, Is the Bottleneckcited by 0
- 2026OrchSLM: Probing the Dynamics of Small Language Model Orchestrationcited by 0
- 2026OrchSLM: Probing the Dynamics of Small Language Model Orchestration11 Sep 2026
- 2026Test-Time Scaling in the Wild: Why Exploitation, Not Exploration, Is the Bottleneck19 Aug 2026
- 2025Input-Time Scaling: Adding Noise and Irrelevance into Less-Is-More Drastically Improves Reasoning Performance and Efficiency19 Aug 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025AgentTTS: Large Language Model Agent for Test-time Compute-optimal Scaling Strategy in Complex Tasks
- 2025Generalizing Test-time Compute-optimal Scaling as an Optimizable Graph
- 2025Scaling Test-time Compute for LLM Agents
- 2025A Survey on Test-Time Scaling in Large Language Models: What, How, Where, and How Well?
- 2025Can 1B LLM Surpass 405B LLM? Rethinking Compute-Optimal Test-Time Scaling
- 2026TMAS: Scaling Test-Time Compute via Multi-Agent Synergy
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters
- 2025Two Heads are Better Than One: Test-time Scaling of Multi-agent Collaborative Reasoning