Pulse Shape Discrimination Algorithms: Survey and Benchmark
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This review presents a comprehensive survey and benchmark of pulse shape discrimination (PSD) algorithms for radiation detection, classifying nearly sixty methods into statistical (time-domain, frequency-domain, neural network-based) and prior-knowledge (machine learning, deep learning) paradigms. We implement and evaluate all algorithms on two standardized datasets: an unlabeled set from a 241Am-9Be source and a time-of-flight labeled set from a 238Pu-9Be source, using metrics including Figure of Merit (FOM), F1-score, ROC-AUC, and inter-method correlations. Our analysis reveals that deep learning models, particularly Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLPs) and hybrid approaches combining statistical features with neural regression, often outperform traditional methods. We discuss architectural suitabilities, the limitations of FOM, alternative evaluation metrics, and performance across energy thresholds. Accompanying this work, we release an open-source toolbox in Python and MATLAB, along with the datasets, to promote reproducibility and advance PSD research.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2025.
Builds on
8 of 82 references.
References · 8
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2023Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spacescited by 4,718
- 2021Transformers in Vision: A Surveycited by 1,013
- 2020A Survey of Convolutional Neural Networks: Analysis, Applications, and Prospectscited by 397
- 2022Pulse Shape Simulation and Discrimination using Machine-Learning Techniquescited by 2
- 2024Random-coupled Neural Networkcited by 2
- 2023Pulse shape discrimination based on the Tempotron: a powerful classifier on GPUcited by 1
- 2023Dataset for neutron and gamma-ray pulse shape discriminationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.