Advancing Science- and Evidence-based AI Policy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
AI policy should advance AI innovation by ensuring that its potential benefits are responsibly realized and widely shared. To achieve this, AI policymaking should place a premium on evidence: Scientific understanding and systematic analysis should inform policy, and policy should accelerate evidence generation. But policy outcomes reflect institutional constraints, political dynamics, electoral pressures, stakeholder interests, media environment, economic considerations, cultural contexts, and leadership perspectives. Adding to this complexity is the reality that the broad reach of AI may mean that evidence and policy are misaligned: Although some evidence and policy squarely address AI, much more partially intersects with AI. Well-designed policy should integrate evidence that reflects scientific understanding rather than hype. An increasing number of efforts address this problem by often either (i) contributing research into the risks of AI and their effective mitigation or (ii) advocating for policy to address these risks. This paper tackles the hard problem of how to optimize the relationship between evidence and policy to address the opportunities and challenges of increasingly powerful AI.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2025.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 5.
7 papers.
- 2026Measuring Mid-2025 LLM-Assistance on Novice Performance in Biologycited by 6
- 2025NeurIPS should lead scientific consensus on AI policycited by 3
- 2026Internal Deployment Gaps in AI Regulationcited by 2
- 2026Algorithmic Monocultures in Hiringcited by 2
- 2026Paradox of De-identification: A Critique of HIPAA Safe Harbour in the Age of LLMscited by 1
- 2026Governing Reflective Human-AI Collaboration: A Framework for Epistemic Scaffolding and Traceable Reasoningcited by 1
- 2025Reflexive Evidence-Based Multimodal Learning for Clean Energy Transitions: Causal Insights on Cooking Fuel Access, Urbanization, and Carbon Emissionscited by 0
- 2026Algorithmic Monocultures in Hiring26 May 2026
- 2026Governing Reflective Human-AI Collaboration: A Framework for Epistemic Scaffolding and Traceable Reasoning16 Apr 2026
- 2026Measuring Mid-2025 LLM-Assistance on Novice Performance in Biology18 Feb 2026
- 2026Paradox of De-identification: A Critique of HIPAA Safe Harbour in the Age of LLMs9 Feb 2026
- 2026Internal Deployment Gaps in AI Regulation12 Jan 2026
- 2025Reflexive Evidence-Based Multimodal Learning for Clean Energy Transitions: Causal Insights on Cooking Fuel Access, Urbanization, and Carbon Emissions19 Nov 2025
- 2025NeurIPS should lead scientific consensus on AI policy30 Sep 2025